Abstract:Background context: Care for low back pain (LBP) is costly, fragmented and, in non-compensation populations, rarely specifically addresses factors associated with maintaining employment status or return to work (RTW). Purpose: This study aimed to identify modifiable independent risk factors for (1) a negative work status at presentation and (2) a change in work status during treatment in a cohort of LBP patients. The results are intended to inform improvement in best-evidence care pathways to maximize societal outcomes and overall value of a new model of care. Study design/setting: A prospective observational study was carried out. Inclusion criteria: Work-eligible, non-workers compensation patients with recurrent or persistent LBP ≥6 weeks and ≤12 months. Setting: The Inter-professional Spine Assessment and Education Clinics (ISAEC)-a novel Government-funded shared-care model of management for LBP. Methods: This study used the following methods: (1) Cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from the initial ISAEC consultation (t0) from December 2012 to April 2014. Work status at t0 was dichotomized as employed (E) or underemployed (UE; unemployed, modified work duty, or disability). Multivariate logistic regression modeling was used to determine independent predictors of UE status at t0. (2) Bivariate analysis of longitudinal data from t0 to 6 months (t1) to identify risk factors for work status change. Employment journey categorized into four groups: Et0/Et1-employed at t0 and employed at t1; Et0/UEt1-employed at t0 and underemployed at t1; UEt0/Et1-underemployed at t0 and employed at t1; UEt0/UEt1-underemployed at t0 and underemployed at t1. Results: This study yielded the following results: (1) Initial consultation data on 462 consecutive patients (Et0=344, UEt0=118). Multivariate logistic regression identified legal claim, depression, smoking, and higher STarT Back (or Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]) score as independent risk factors for UEt0. (2) Overall UE rate did not significantly change during longitudinal analysis (n=178, UEt0=25.5%, UEt1=22.9%). However, 10.5% of Et0 became UEt1 (Et0/Et1=102, Et0/UEt1=12). Bivariate analysis identified elevated baseline ODI score as the only significant predictor variable for UEt1 in Et0 cohort (p=.0101). Conversely, ISAEC improved the employment status in 41% of UEt0 to Et1 (UEt0/Et1=16, UEt0/UEt1=23), and the absence of depression was significant for predicting RTW (p=.0001). Conclusions: From a societal perspective, employment status as an outcome measure is paramount in assessing the value of a new model of care for LBP. Mitigation strategies for the predictor variables identified will be included in ISAEC pathways to translate clinical improvement into societal added value.

The Association of Physiotherapy Continuity of Care with Duration of Time Loss Among Compensated Australian Workers with Low Back Pain

How Much Physiotherapy, Chiropractic, and Osteopathy Care Do Compensated Australian Workers with Low Back Pain Receive? A Retrospective Cohort Study

Patterns of physiotherapy attendance in compensated Australian workers with low back pain: a retrospective cohort study

Patterns of Mental Health Service Use in Australian Workers with Low Back Pain: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Administrative delays and chronic disability in patients with acute occupational low back injury

Physiotherapy-led care versus physician-led care for persons with low back pain: A systematic review

Time off work following psychological injury among health and social care workers: a population-based retrospective cohort study in New South Wales, Australia

Primary care referral of patients with low back pain to physical therapy: impact on future health care utilization and costs

Work-related factors contributing to chronic disability in low back pain

The relationship between changes in pain intensity and functional disability in persistent disabling low back pain during a course of cognitive functional therapy

The importance of identifying and modifying unemployment predictor variables in the evolution of a novel model of care for low back pain in the general population

Exploring the association between adherence to home-based exercise recommendations and recovery of nonspecific low back pain: a prospective cohort study

The effectiveness of an early active intervention program for workers with soft-tissue injuries. The Early Claimant Cohort Study

Physiotherapists' experiences of implementation of the BetterBack model of care for low back pain in primary care - a focus group interview study

The Definition and Application of Pilates Exercise to Treat People With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Delphi Survey of Australian Physical Therapists

Immediate Physical Therapy Initiation in Patients With Acute Low Back Pain Is Associated With a Reduction in Downstream Health Care Utilization and Costs

Identifying factors associated with physical therapy use versus non‐use among injured workers with back pain in Washington State

Association between continuity of care (COC), healthcare use and costs: what can we learn from claims data? A rapid review

Effect of the association of continuous shortwave diathermy and Pilates-based exercises on pain, depression, and anxiety in chronic non-specific low back pain: a randomized clinical trial

Cognitive behavioural interventions led by a physiotherapist in chronic non-specific low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis