"I think we did the best that we could in the space:” A qualitative study exploring individuals’ experiences with three unconventional environments for patients with a delayed hospital discharge
Michelle Marcinow,Lauren Cadel,Arija Birze,Jane Sandercock,Junhee Baek,Walter Wodchis,Sara J T Guilcher,Kerry Kuluski,Sara J. T. Guilcher
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297542
IF: 3.7
2024-02-27
PLoS ONE
Abstract:Background Given growing hospital capacity pressures, persistent delayed discharges, and ongoing efforts to improve patient flow, the use of unconventional environments (newly created or repurposed areas for patient care) is becoming increasingly common. Despite this, little is known about individuals’ experiences in providing or receiving care in these environments. Objectives The objectives of this study were to: (1) describe the characteristics of three unconventional environments used to care for patients experiencing a delayed discharge, and (2) explore individuals’ experiences with the three unconventional environments. Methods This was a multi-method qualitative study of three unconventional environments in Ontario, Canada. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and observations. Participants included patients, caregivers, healthcare providers, and clinical managers who had experience with delayed discharges. In-person observations of two environments were conducted. Interviews were transcribed and notes from the observations were recorded. Data were coded and analyzed thematically. Results Twenty-nine individuals participated. Three themes were identified for unconventional environments: (1) implications on the physical safety of patients; (2) implications on staffing models and continuity of care; and, (3) implications on team interactions and patient care. Participants discussed how the physical set-up of some unconventional spaces was not conducive to patient needs, especially those with cognitive impairment. Limited space made it difficult to maintain privacy and develop social relationships. However, the close proximity of team members allowed for more focused collaborations regarding patient care and contributed to staff fulfilment. A smaller, consistent care team and access to onsite physicians seemed to foster improved continuity of care. Conclusions There is potential to learn from multi-stakeholder perspectives in unconventional environments to improve experiences and optimize patient care. Key considerations include keeping hallways and patient rooms clear, having communal spaces for activities and socialization, co-locating team members to improve interactions and access to resources, and ensuring a consistent care team.
multidisciplinary sciences