Abstract:Objective: To explore the effects of multidisciplinary comprehensive intervention in integrated treatment of patients with extremely severe burns. Methods: One hundred and ten patients hospitalized in our center from July 2013 to August 2017 met the criteria for inclusion in this study, and their medical records were retrospectively analyzed. According to the medical model at that time, 56 patients hospitalized from July 2013 to July 2015 received routine comprehensive treatment led by doctors, and they were included in the conventional intervention group. From August 2015 to August 2017, 54 patients were treated with integrated multidisciplinary interventions performed by a team consisting of physicians, intensive care nurses, burn nurses, intravenous infusion nurses, wound stoma nurses, and rehabilitation therapists, and they were included in the integrated intervention group. Acute Physiological and Chronic Health Assessment Ⅱ (APACHE Ⅱ) scores on admission and 4 weeks after treatment, incidences of pressure injury, wound sepsis, lung infection, and catheter-related infection during hospitalization, length of stay in intensive care unit (ICU) and total length of hospital stay, and Abbreviated Burn Specific Health Scale (BSHS-A) scores at discharge and 3 months after discharge were analyzed. Data were processed with t-test and chi-square test. Results: The APACHE Ⅱ scores of patients in the two groups were close on admission (t=0.573, P>0.05). Four weeks after treatment, the APACHE Ⅱ scores of patients in the two groups were obviously lower than those on admission within the same group (t=5.697, 4.853, P<0.01), and the score of the integrated intervention group was obviously lower than that of the conventional intervention group (t=2.170, P<0.05). No pressure injury was observed in patients of any group during hospitalization. The incidences of wound sepsis, lung infection, and catheter-related infection of patients in the integrated intervention group were 18.5% (10/54), 3.7% (2/54), and 9.3% (5/54), respectively, significantly lower than 42.9% (24/56), 21.4% (12/56), and 26.8% (15/56) of the conventional intervention group, χ2=4.073, 6.075, 3.962, P<0.05. The length of stay in ICU of patients in the integrated intervention group was (50±5) d, obviously shorter than (62±4) d of the conventional intervention group (t=2.852, P<0.01). The total length of hospital stay of patients in the integrated intervention group was (115±8) d, obviously shorter than (140±7) d of the conventional intervention group (t=16.885, P<0.01). At discharge and 3 months after discharge, the scores of BSHS-A, physical function, psychological function, and general health status of 50 patients in the integrated intervention group were significantly higher than those of 48 patients in the conventional intervention group (t=2.886, 3.126, 2.416, 2.544, 2.033, 3.471, 2.588, 2.210, P<0.05 or P<0.01), while the scores of social function of patients in the two groups were close (t=1.570, 1.350, P>0.05). Conclusions: Integrative treatment of patients with extremely severe burns by multidisciplinary comprehensive intervention can significantly alleviate the severity of burns, reduce the incidences of wound sepsis, lung infection, and catheter-related infection, shorten the length of stay in ICU and total length of hospital stay, and improve the quality of life.

New indices for bibliographic data and their applications

Risk Factors for and Clinical Outcomes of Polymicrobial Acinetobacter Baumannii Bloodstream Infections

A Multicenter, Retrospective Outcome Analysis of Vancomycin Area Under the Curve Versus Trough-Based Dosing Strategies in Patients With Burn OR Inhalational Injuries (MONITOR)

A Multicenter Clinical Trial of Piperacillin/tazobactam in Burn Infection

[Preliminary Comparative Study on the Effects of Early Enteral Supplementation of Synbiotics on Severely Burned Patients].

Mission reliability modeling and evaluation of multi-mission phased mission system based on an extended object-oriented Petri net

510 Antibiotic Serum Concentrations in Burn Patients with Augmented Renal Clearance and Adjusted Regimens

Microbiological and Clinical Evidence from a 9-Year Cohort

Management and prevention of drug resistant infections in burn patients

Spatial patterns of surgery attendance: some implications for the provision of primary health care.

Cutaneous Burn Injury Modulates Urinary Antimicrobial Peptide Responses and the Urinary Microbiome

The Asynchronous Dynamic Changes and Interrelationships Between Leukocyte Composition and Inflammatory Markers and Potential Clinical Significance in the Early Stage and Sepsis Stage in Severe Burns.

Epidemiology and outcomes of bloodstream infections in severe burn patients: a six-year retrospective study

6 A Multicenter Outcome Analysis of Vancomycin Dosing Strategies in Burn Patients

Effectiveness and Safety of Beta-Lactam Antibiotics with and without Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa Pneumonia or Bloodstream Infection

717 Survival Benefit with a Topical Anti-inflammatory with Antimicrobial Properties in Patients with >15%; TBSA Burns

Evaluation of Procalcitonin Accuracy for the Distinction Between Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Bacterial Sepsis in Burn Patients.

Bacterial Infections After Burn Injuries: Impact of Multidrug Resistance

[Observation on the effects of multidisciplinary comprehensive intervention in integrated treatment of patients with extremely severe burns].

A Meta-Analysis of the Mortality and the Prevalence of Burn Complications in Western Populations

The Profile of Bacterial Infections in a Burn Unit during and after the COVID-19 Pandemic Period