Early insights into Piaget's cognitive development model through the lens of the Technologies curriculum

Milorad Cerovac,Therese Keane
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-024-09906-5
2024-06-09
International Journal of Technology and Design Education
Abstract:Piaget's theory of stage structure is synonymous with discussions involving cognitive development. As with any theoretical model, researchers inevitably and rightly seek to affirm and/or contest the elements of the model presented. In this comparative study, students' performance across three hands-on engineering tasks for two distinct student cohort groups were investigated including young primary school students (aged 8 to 10) in Piaget's concrete operations; and older secondary school students (aged 15 to 18) in Piaget's formal operations stage of cognitive development. The purpose was to gain an insight into Piaget's stage structure from the perspective of the compulsory national Technologies curriculum in Australia, of which engineering is a core subject. The senior students outperformed their younger peers on all three tasks (simple, complicated and complex), with differences in abstraction and spatial inferential reasoning abilities increasing, as the task complexity increased. Although there is very limited evidence linking practical technological subjects and Piaget's cognitive development model, the findings were consistent with respect to students' abstract thinking capabilities and their cognitive development.
engineering, multidisciplinary,education & educational research,education, scientific disciplines
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the Paper Attempts to Solve This paper attempts to explore the impact of Piaget's theory of cognitive development stages on abstract thinking and spatial reasoning abilities through practical tasks in technical courses (engineering disciplines). Specifically, the study aims to compare the performance differences of students from two different age groups (elementary school students aged 8 to 10 in the concrete operational stage; high school students aged 15 to 18 in the formal operational stage) when solving engineering tasks of varying complexity. #### Research Background and Objectives - **Research Background**: Piaget's cognitive development model has always been a key area in educational research. Although there has been extensive research analyzing Piaget's theory and its impact on students' cognitive performance, there is still relatively little research in technical courses, especially in terms of abstract thinking and spatial reasoning abilities. - **Research Objectives**: - Compare the abstract thinking and spatial reasoning abilities of students from different age groups. - Explore how these abilities change with the complexity of the tasks. - Provide evidence to support teachers in better designing technical course activities that align with students' cognitive development stages. #### Main Research Questions - **RQ1**: How does the performance of students from different age groups in abstract thinking and spatial reasoning abilities change with task complexity? - **RQ2**: When faced with complex practical tasks, do students plan first or directly start constructing? ### Conclusion The study found that older students outperformed younger students in all three tasks, especially in terms of abstract thinking and spatial reasoning abilities. This difference became more pronounced as task complexity increased. This suggests that Piaget's theory of cognitive development stages has some applicability in explaining students' problem-solving abilities. The research results help teachers better understand students' cognitive development levels and adjust their teaching strategies accordingly.