Abstract:Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of two procedures in the treatment of hemorrhoid: the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR). Methods: A retrospective cohort research was conducted. Clinical data of 263 patients undergoing the first elective surgery for grade IV hemorrhoids by the same team of surgeons at our department from January 2015 to December 2016 were analyzed retrospectively, while those had other anorectal diseases, emergency surgery, inflammatory bowel disease, tumor and incomplete clinical data were excluded. PPH was performed in 129 patients and STARR was performed in 134 patients. PPH procedure: a circular purse 2-0 string suture was made at 4 cm above the dentate line; in accordance with the standard protocol, the PPH circular stapling devicewas introduced; the suture was closed, and a pull-through followed; the traction was continued; the stapler was fired; the prolapsed mucosa and submucosa were removed. STARR procedure: 3-5 needles were sutured in the anterior rectal mucosa, protecting the posterior wall mucosa; with the help of a finger the PPH stapler was inserted into the vaginal lumen; the sutures were hooked from both sides of the stapler to maintain traction; according to the disease condition, the suturewas tightened appropriately; stapler was screwed and activated; the anterior wall mucosa was removed; the joint of the both ends of anastomosis was cut; the posterior wall mucosa was removed as well. The short-term efficacy, surgical safety and prognosis of the two groups were compared. Results: There were 67 males (51.9%) in the PPH group and 57 (42.5%) males in the STARR group. The median age of the two groups was 51.0 (22.0, 80.0) years and 49.0 (24.0, 74.0) years, respectively. There were no significant differences in the baseline data between the two groups (all P>0.05). No significant differences in the intraoperative bleeding, length of hospital stay, postoperative analgesic drug use, postoperative bleeding, postoperative infection, etc. were found between two groups (all P>0.05). As compared to PPH group, STAAR group had longer operation time and higher hospitalization cost with significant differences [(44.0±19.3) minutes vs. (26.3±8.5) minutes, t=9.701, P=0.001; (11 047±473) yuan vs. (7674±309) yuan, t=32.826, P=0.001]. One case in STAAR group developed rectovaginal fistula. The median follow-up period of the whole group was 40 (33, 52) months. A total of 108 cases in STARR group and 114 cases in PPH group completed the follow-up. The 3-year disease-relapse rate was 0 in STARR group and 4.2% in PPH group (P=0.042). Conclusion: STARR procedure can improve the prognosis in the treatment of grade IV hemorrhoid, but attention should be paid to the development of complications.

Laparoscopic removal of a retroperitoneal extralobar pulmonary sequestration in an adult

Long time consequences after STARR procedure: Report of 15 years experience and medico-legal perspective

Stapled Trans-anal Rectal Resection Using Single Versus Double Stapler in Surgical Management of Obstructed Defecation: A Randomised Clinical Trial

Errors in spectroscopic measurements of SO2 due to nonexponential absorption of laser radiation, with application to the remote monitoring of atmospheric pollutants.

Outcomes of a Modified Bresler Procedure for the Treatment of Rectocele with Rectal Intussusception

Obstructed Defecation Syndrome: Analysis of the Efficacy and Mid-Term Quality of Life of an Innovative Robotic Approach

The therapeutic efficacy evaluation of modified Bresler in the treatment of obstructed defecation syndrome associated with rectocele and rectal mucosal prolapse

Early and late (ten years) experience with circular stapler hemorrhoidectomy

Early safety and efficiency outcomes of a novel interdisciplinary laparoscopic resection rectopexy combined with sacrocolpopexy for women with obstructive defecation syndrome and pelvic organ prolapse: a single center study

[Procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids versus stapled transanal rectal resection in the treatment of grade IV hemorrhoids].

Surgical results and functional outcome after total anorectal reconstruction by double graciloplasty supported by external-source electrostimulation and/or implantable pulse generators: an 8-year experience

Stapled transanal rectal resection versus procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids for the treatment of grade Ⅳ hemorrhoids

Anorectal reconstruction by electrostimulated graciloplasty as part of abdominoperineal resection

Effect of defunction on cytokinetics and cancer at colonic suture lines

Assignment of human 17 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase IV to chromosome 5q2 by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Concepts and questions in programming cardiac resynchronization devices.

Stapled Anastomosis Versus Hand-Sewn Anastomosis With Mucosectomy for Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Postoperative Outcomes, Functional Outcomes, and Oncological Safety

Critical and Gaussian conductivity fluctuations in YBa2Cu3O7- delta.

Colorectal Anastomotic Stenosis: Lessons Learned after 1643 Colorectal Resections for Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis

Colorectal eversion technique combined with modified single‐stapled double‐purse‐string low colorectal anastomosis

Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Stapled Hemorroidopexy Plus Ligation Anopexy With Stapled Hemorroidepexy for Managing Grade III and IV Hemorroidal Disease