Unraveling hallmark suitability for staging pre- and post-implantation stem cell models

Constance Onfray,Simon Chevolleau,Eva Moinard,Océane Girard,Kasturi Mahadik,Ryan Allsop,Grigorios Georgolopoulos,Régis Lavigne,Ophélie Renoult,Irene Aksoy,Elsa Lemaitre,Philippe Hulin,Jean-François Ouimette,Thomas Fréour,Claire Pecqueur,Charles Pineau,Vincent Pasque,Claire Rougeulle,Laurent David
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114232
IF: 8.8
2024-05-17
Cell Reports
Abstract:Onfray et al. report the comparison of hTSCs, hTELCs, and primed, extended, and naive hPSCs by transcriptomics, proteomics, DNAme quantification, X, and metabolic activity. TELCs have features of trophectoderms, while TSCs represent post-implantation trophoblasts. hEPSCs are clearly primed cells but display a higher metabolic and clonogenic potential than regular primed PSCs.
cell biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?