Cross-reactivity and avidity of antibody responses induced in humans by the oral inactivated multivalent enterotoxigenicEscherichia coli (ETEC) vaccine ETVAX

Susannah Leach,Anna Lundgren,Nils Carlin,Madeleine Löfstrand,Ann-Mari Svennerholm
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.06.006
IF: 4.169
2017-07-13
Vaccine
Abstract:We investigated whether the oral inactivated, multivalent enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) vaccine ETVAX, consisting of four E. coli strains over-expressing the colonisation factors (CFs) CFA/I, CS3, CS5 and CS6, combined with the toxoid LCTBA, could induce cross-reactive antibodies to CFs related to the CFA/I and CS5 families. We also evaluated the avidity of vaccine induced antibodies against the toxoid and CFs. Cross-reactivity was analysed in mucosal (faecal and antibodies in lymphocyte supernatants, ALS) samples, and antibody avidity in serum and ALS samples, from two phase I trials: a primary vaccination study, where two oral doses of ETVAX were given±the double mutant heat labile toxin (dmLT) adjuvant at a 2-week interval, and a booster vaccination study, where a single booster dose of ETVAX was given 13-23months after primary vaccinations. We found that 65-90% of subjects who had responded to CFA/I in ALS or faecal specimens also developed cross-reactive antibodies to the related CFs tested, i.e. CS1, CS14 and CS17, and that approximately 80% of those responding to CS5 also responded to the closely related CS7. For subjects who had developed cross-reactive antibodies, the magnitudes of responses against vaccine CFs and related non-vaccine CFs were comparable. Using both a simple method of antibody avidity determination based on limiting antigen dilution, as well as a chaotropic ELISA method, we found that the avidity of serum and ALS antibodies to key vaccine antigens increased after a late booster dose compared to after primary vaccination. Our results suggest that the cross-reactive antibody responses against multiple CFs may result in expanded ETEC strain coverage of ETVAX and that repeated vaccinations induce vaccine-specific antibodies with increased binding capacity.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?