Large plaque parapsoriasis with the “deck‐chair” sign successfully treated with bath psoralen and ultraviolet A therapy

M. Inaoki,Chiho Kawabata,M. Yagishita,C. Nishijima
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1346-8138.2010.00832.x
2010-06-01
Abstract:Figure 1. A picture of the trunk, showing extensive erythema with sparing of the abdominal and axillary skin folds, producing the ‘‘deck-chair’’ sign. Dear Editor, Papuloerythroderma of Ofuji is characterized by widespread pruritic solid flat-topped papules coalescing into erythroderma which spares the skin folds. The prominent sparing of the skin folds of the trunk has been termed the ‘‘deck-chair’’ sign. Although the deck-chair sign is a classic feature of papuloerythroderma, this sign has been reported in other diseases. Herein, we report an unusual case of generalized erythema with the deck-chair sign which responded to bath psoralen and ultraviolet A (PUVA) therapy. A 74-year-old Japanese woman presented with a 3-year history of slightly pruritic erythema on the abdomen and lower extremities. Treatment with topical corticosteroid was ineffective, and the erythema spread over the trunk and extremities. There was no personal or family history of atopy. She had been taking amlodipine besylate for the treatment of hypertension for 5 years. She did not take any other potential causative medicine or supplements. Examination showed slightly scaly erythema or thin plaques on the trunk and extremities. There was a sparing of the skin folds on the chest and abdomen, resulting in the deck-chair sign (Fig. 1). There was no lymphoadenopathy or hepatosplenomegaly. Histological examination of an erythema of the left upper arm showed mild hyperkeratosis, focal acanthosis, vacuolization of the basal cell layer of the epidermis, epidermotropism, small Pautrier microabscesses, and infiltration of lymphocytes in the upper dermis (Fig. 2). Some of the lymphocytes had slightly hyperchromatic and irregularly-shaped nuclei. Immunohistochemical staining of the lymphocytes showed a normal ratio of CD4 lymphocytes and CD8 lymphocytes. Direct immunofluorescence examination was negative for
What problem does this paper attempt to address?