Intrathecal anaesthesia for day‐case knee arthroscopy – a reply

A. Ambrosoli,L. Guzzetti,G. Cappelleri
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.13659
IF: 12.893
2016-07-01
Anaesthesia
Abstract:two participants (4%) after intrathecal blockade and eight participants (16%) after peripheral nerve blockade. Successful nerve blockade is less reliably achieved than intrathecal anaesthesia [2]. The obturator nerve supplies the adductor muscle group and gives off an articular branch to innervate the knee joint. In the current study, this nerve was not blocked, perhaps explaining the greater proportion of patients requiring fentanyl in this group. Would it require blocking to provide complete anaesthesia for knee arthroscopy? We would also like to know whether or not a tourniquet was routinely used for knee arthroscopy in the authors’ institute. Finally, the authors state that peripheral nerve blockade takes longer than intrathecal anaesthesia, yet surgery can proceed as soon because of more rapid onset. However, when the procedure and onset time are combined, we found the median (IQR [range]) time from anaesthetic start to surgical readiness was 9 (7.1–14.8 [4.5–41]) and 12 (9– 16.7 [4.5–38.6]) min for spinal and peripheral nerve block respectively. Was this quicker time in the spinal group statistically significant? Low-dose spinal anaesthesia in a day case setting is safe, effective and efficient. Invariably, our surgeons talk the patient through the operation using a second arthroscopy screen. Patients greatly appreciate this and it avoids the need for a follow-up outpatient clinic.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?