Abstract:Managing activities that result in human–wildlife conflict is a challenging goal for modern scientists and managers. In recent years, the self‐motivated feeding of wildlife by humans has garnered popularity but with consequent risks for the health and safety of both parties. This has resulted in calls for management in areas of high contact, for example, parklands. Traditional controls are typically utilised (i.e. signage, patrols), yet their success is varied, leading to a rise in research aiming to improve them. This research has primarily focused on language and design, with little attention paid to the role that audience type (i.e. international tourists vs. locals/residents) may play in their success. Proportions in audience type present can vary both between parks and spatially within a single park, however, controls are usually applied homogeneously with no consideration for how response may vary between these groups. Here, we performed a robust before–after study across two summers using a wild fallow deer population in a public park that are commonly fed by visitors as our model. We deployed controls, following best practice as outlined by the literature, and tested their overall effectiveness. We then identified key areas with differences in visitor type proportions and tested for variation in success between them. We found that the numbers of visitors feeding the deer significantly decreased overall after the introduction of controls, although interactions were not eliminated entirely. We discovered that the effectiveness of these controls varied with changes in visitor type, with the most positive effects occurring in areas with more international tourists and no significant effect occurring in areas dominated by resident visitors. Notably, of the food offerings remaining, the proportion of foods that could be perceived as 'nutritionally beneficial' increased in both sites, marking overall changes in the behaviours of even those visitors who refused to stop feeding. These findings highlight the importance of target audience research in human–wildlife conflict management. We recommend that authorities aiming to reduce these interactions perform systematic surveys to identify the audience type present and cater controls accordingly to maximise their success. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Don't forget to look down - collaborative approaches to predator conservation

Individual and collective responses to large carnivore management: the roles of trust, representation, knowledge spheres, communication and leadership

Managing conflict between large carnivores and livestock

Carnivore conservation needs evidence-based livestock protection

A review of financial instruments to pay for predator conservation and encourage human–carnivore coexistence

Global large carnivore conservation and international law

Collaborative conservation for snow leopards: Lessons learned from successful community‐based interventions

The importance of tangible and intangible factors in human-carnivore coexistence

Landscapes of coexistence for terrestrial carnivores: the ecological consequences of being downgraded from ultimate to penultimate predator by humans

Reducing risky interactions: Identifying barriers to the successful management of human–wildlife conflict in an urban parkland

Research priorities from animal behaviour for maximising conservation progress

Making more effective use of human behavioural science in conservation interventions

Compassionate versus consequentialist conservation

How effective are interventions to reduce attacks on people from large carnivores? A systematic review protocol

Proactive cursorial and ambush predation risk avoidance in four African herbivore species

Mesocarnivore community structuring in the presence of Africa's apex predator

A deepening understanding of animal culture suggests lessons for conservation

Using animal behavior in conservation management: a series of systematic reviews and maps

Large carnivores and conflict: lion conservation in context

Tradeoffs between resources and risks shape the responses of a large carnivore to human disturbance

Conservation through connection: Approaches to engaging communities in applied grizzly bear research