Abstract:Purpose: The main aim of this study is to empirically investigate the relationship between executive compensation, inequality, and corporate governance, thus filling a gap in extant literature. Design/methodology/approach: The methodology used calculated the salary Gini (s-Gini) and governance indices (G-index) for companies in the sample and these were used as proxies for inequality and corporate governance respectively. The dataset is panel in nature. It comprises 46 conveniently selected largest JSE listed companies (by market capitalisation). A 2-step system GMM was used to determine if s-Gini and G-index were channels through which executive compensation could influence company performance. While considering a dynamic specifi-cation, the GMM estimator addressed possible endogeneity bias. GMM estimation method addressed potential over or underestimation of the relationship between company performance and executive compensation because it was considered more efficient on shorter panels. GMM analysis on companies listed on the JSE Top40 index was from 2008 to 2020. Overall, the methodology and analysis employed provide valuable insights into the complexities between executive compensation, inequality, corporate governance, and company performance, shedding light on important factors that can influence company's performance. Findings: Results indicated that as executive compensation improved, company performance deteriorated. Furthermore, varied impact of inequality on performance measures were recorded. The observation was that inequality influenced performance in diverse ways. This accentuated the convoluted nature of this relationship. The study also established that both inequality and corporate governance are channels through which executive remuneration affects performance. Additionally, a positive nexus between governance and net profit margin was discovered. Research limitations/implications: The results imply that: higher executive pay does not always yield better com-pany performance; the effects of executive pay on performance are mediated by the level of inequality within the company and the quality of corporate governance practices; good corporate governance practices can enhance financial performance. It is recommended that companies should prioritise espousal of sound corporate governance practices because they have positive influence on performance. Moreover, diligent attention must be given to how executive compensation is configured. Poorly designed compensation packages erode company value. Conversely, properly structured ones may enhance performance and successively improve company value. This study is focused solely on the Top40 largest listed companies in South Africa. The findings may not be generalisable to all listed entities, as there could be variations in the relationship between executive compensation, inequality, and corporate governance across companies of different sizes. By concentrating on the largest entities, the study may gloss over nuances that exist in smaller companies. However, it is important to state that the insights gained from this research are still valuable and can provide useful guidance to policymakers, shareholders, and other stakeholders in under-standing the interaction of the variables examined within the context of larger firms. Future research should consider expanding the sample to include a broader range of listed entities to obtain a more comprehensive understanding of these relationships across the entire corporate landscape. Originality/value: This study contributes to research gap highlighted by Core et al.

The Relationship between Board Characteristics and Dividend Payment Policies in the JSE Top 40 Listed Companies

Investigating the link between board independence and dividend distributions in South Africa

Corporate Governance in South Africa: Profit-Sharing and Stakeholder Management

A theoretical and econometric evaluation of corporate governance and capital structure in JSE-listed companies

An analysis of corporate governance and company performance: a South African perspective

The Nexus between Executive Compensation and Firm Performance: Does Governance and Inequality Matter?

The impact of flexible corporate governance disclosures on value relevance. Empirical evidence from South Africa

Factors Influencing Dividend Payout of Firms Listed at the Nairobi Securities Exchange, Kenya

Corporate social responsibility and dividend payout policy in extraordinary time: Empirical study of South Africa

Does gender diversity in the audit committee influence corporate dividend policy? Evidence from French listed firms

Gender and other major board characteristics in China: Explaining corporate dividend policy and governance

Institutional determinants of dividend policy of African listed firms

The audit committee and dividend policy: an empirical study of the post-SOX era

Does corporate social responsibility affect dividend policy? Empirical evidence in the French context

Corporate Governance Disclosure Attributes and Organisational Performance in Sub-Sahara Africa

Board diversity and corporate payout policy: Do free cash flow and ownership concentration matter?

Board attributes and sustainability reporting of selected listed nonfinancial firms in anglophone Sub-Saharan African countries: A multinomial logistic regression

Impact of dividend policy on corporate social responsibility: the role of board governance mechanism

The Importance of Traits of Board of Commissioners, company Size, Profitability and Free Cash Flow in Affecting the Dividend Policy

Executive Compensation Schemes: Accelerants of Agency and Corporate Governance Problems in South Africa

Relationship between black ownership, capital structure and company performance