Abstract:The process of opinion expression and exchange is a critical component of democratic societies. As people interact with large language models (LLMs) in the opinion shaping process different from traditional media, the impacts of LLMs are increasingly recognized and being concerned. However, the knowledge about how LLMs affect the process of opinion expression and exchange of social opinion networks is very limited. Here, we create an opinion network dynamics model to encode the opinions of LLMs, cognitive acceptability and usage strategies of individuals, and simulate the impact of LLMs on opinion dynamics in a variety of scenarios. The outcomes of the simulations inform about effective demand-oriented opinion network interventions. The results from this study suggested that the output opinion of LLMs has a unique and positive effect on the collective opinion difference. The marginal effect of cognitive acceptability on collective opinion formation is nonlinear and shows a decreasing trend. When people partially rely on LLMs, the exchange process of opinion becomes more intense and the diversity of opinion becomes more favorable. In fact, there is 38.6% more opinion diversity when people all partially rely on LLMs, compared to prohibiting the use of LLMs entirely. The optimal diversity of opinion was found when the fractions of people who do not use, partially rely on, and fully rely on LLMs reached roughly 4:12:1. Our experiments also find that introducing extra agents with opposite/neutral/random opinions, we can effectively mitigate the impact of biased/toxic output from LLMs. Our findings provide valuable insights into opinion dynamics in the age of LLMs, highlighting the need for customized interventions tailored to specific scenarios to address the drawbacks of improper output and use of LLMs.

Can LLMs Help Predict Elections? (Counter)Evidence from the World's Largest Democracy

Hidden Persuaders: LLMs' Political Leaning and Their Influence on Voters

LLM Generated Distribution-Based Prediction of US Electoral Results, Part I

A Bi-level assessment of Twitter in predicting the results of an election: Delhi Assembly Elections 2020

United in Diversity? Contextual Biases in LLM-Based Predictions of the 2024 European Parliament Elections

Application of Twitter sentiment analysis in election prediction: a case study of 2019 Indian general election

Large Language Models (LLMs) as Agents for Augmented Democracy

Donald Trumps in the Virtual Polls: Simulating and Predicting Public Opinions in Surveys Using Large Language Models

Can LLMs advance democratic values?

Large Language Models in Politics and Democracy: A Comprehensive Survey

Can Large Language Models Capture Public Opinion about Global Warming? An Empirical Assessment of Algorithmic Fidelity and Bias

Vox Populi, Vox AI? Using Language Models to Estimate German Public Opinion

Fact or Fiction? Can LLMs be Reliable Annotators for Political Truths?

LLM Voting: Human Choices and AI Collective Decision Making

Electoral and Public Opinion Forecasts with Social Media Data: A Meta-Analysis

Uncovering Latent Arguments in Social Media Messaging by Employing LLMs-in-the-Loop Strategy

Assessing Political Bias in Large Language Models

Inducing Political Bias Allows Language Models Anticipate Partisan Reactions to Controversies

Quantifying the Impact of Large Language Models on Collective Opinion Dynamics

Using RL to Identify Divisive Perspectives Improves LLMs Abilities to Identify Communities on Social Media

Prebunking Elections Rumors: Artificial Intelligence Assisted Interventions Increase Confidence in American Elections