Abstract:IntroductionEven in a well-aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA), limb rotation at the time of radiographic assessment will alter the measurement of alignment. This could influence the radiographic outcome of TKA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of limb rotation on radiographic alignment after TKA and to establish a re-calculation of this rotation by using existing radiographic landmarks.Materials and methodsSynthetic femur and tibia (Sawbones®, Inc. Vashon Island, WA) were used to create a TKA of the Triathlon® knee prosthesis system (Stryker®, Limerick, Ireland). The femoral alignment was 6.5° valgus. The model was fixed in an upright stand. Five series of nine anteroposterior (AP) long leg radiographs were taken on a 30 cm × 120 cm plates in full extension with the limb rotated, in 5° increments, from 20° external rotation to 20° internal rotation. After digitizing each radiograph (Scanner Hewlett Packard XJ 527), an observer measured the anatomic mechanical angle of the femur [AMA (°)], the mechanical lateral proximal femur angle [mLPFA (°)], the mechanical lateral distal femur angle [mLDFA (°)], the mechanical medial proximal tibia angle [mMPTA (°)] and the mechanical lateral distal tibia angle [mLDTA (°)] using a digital measurement software (MediCAD®, Hectec, Altfraunhofen, Germany). Besides, the observer measured the geometrical distances of the femoral component figured on the long leg radiograph. A ratio of one distance to another was measured (called femoral component distance ratio).ResultsThe average radiographic anatomic alignment ranged from 6.827° AMA (SD = 0.22°) in 20° internal rotation to 4.627° AMA (SD = 0.22°) in 20° external rotation. Average mLPFA (°) ranged from 101.63° (SD = 0.63) in 20° internal rotation to 93.60° (SD = 0.74°) in 20° external rotation. Average mLDFA (°) ranged from 90.59° (SD = 3.01°) in 20° internal rotation to 86.76° (SD = 0.36°) in 20° external rotation. Average mMPTA (°) ranged from 90.35° (SD = 0.81°) in 20° internal rotation to 88.49° (SD = 0.52°) in 20° external rotation. Average mLDTA (°) ranged from 98.89° (SD = 2.3°) in 20° internal rotation to 90.53° (SD = 3.39°) in 20° external rotation. Without an application of limb rotation, the femoral component distance ratio was measured to be 0.89 (SD = 0.01), in 20° internal rotation 0.63 (SD = 0.01) and in 20° external rotation 1.16 (SD = 0.01).DiscussionLimb rotation had a highly statistically significant effect on measured anatomic alignment and mechanical angles. A correlation between limb rotation, anatomic mechanical angle, mechanical angles measured at femur and tibia and the femoral component distance ratio was established. As the anatomic mechanical angle and the femoral component distance ratio change linearly in the range of 20° internal and external limb rotation, a calculation of the femoral component distance ratio could be used to re-calculate the limb rotation at the time of radiographic assessment to evaluate the evidence of a long leg radiograph.

Mechanical axis of the lower extremity determined by a new digital photographic method.

Radiological Approach to Assessment of Lower-Limb Alignment—Coronal and Transverse Plane Analysis

Anatomical leg length discrepancy is children: can it be accurately determined using 3-D motion capturing?

Effect of limb rotation on radiographic alignment measurement in mal-aligned knees

Validation of a software‐based torsional measurement method of the lower limb: A retrospective study

Taxon-specific ζ-Crystallin in Japanese Tree Frog (Hyla japonica) Lens*

Artificial intelligence-based assessment of leg axis parameters shows excellent agreement with human raters: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Measuring leg length and offset with an imageless navigation system during total hip arthroplasty: is it really accurate?

Distances and angles in standing long-leg radiographs: comparing conventional radiography, digital radiography, and EOS

Comparison of accuracy for hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle by X-ray and knee motion analysis system and the relationships between HKA and gait posture

Comparison of fluoroscopic techniques for assessment of femoral rotational alignment

Validation of full-length radiograph based musculoskeletal modeling method to estimate medial and lateral knee contact forces

Can we trust the accuracy of the automatic calibration of the EOS system to measure lower limb length inequality after total hip arthroplasty? Comparison of EOS versus manual measurement on 110 calibrated radiographs

Automated analysis of knee joint alignment using detailed angular values in long leg radiographs based on deep learning

Influence of axial limb rotation on radiographic lower limb alignment: a systematic review

Developing a Computer Vision Model to Automate Quantitative Measurement of Hip-Knee-Ankle Angle in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Patients

Callosal transfer and left-hand anomia in schizophrenia.

Reliability assessment of leg length and angular alignment on manual reads versus artificial intelligence-generated lower extremity radiographic measurements

Effect of limb rotation on radiographic alignment in total knee arthroplasties

Do small changes in rotation affect measurements of lower extremity limb alignment?

Accuracy of an image matching technique for assessing knee alignment during the stance phase of gait using single-plane anteroposterior radiography