Abstract:Purpose To compare different corneal keratometry readings (swept-source-OCT-assisted biometry and Scheimpflug imaging) with a novel software platform for calculation of toric intraocular lenses. Setting Department of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany. Design Retrospective, non-randomized, clinical trial. Methods Twenty-three eyes undergoing toric intraocular lens implantation were included. Inclusion criteria were preoperative regular corneal astigmatism of at least 1.00 D, no previous refractive surgery, no ocular surface diseases and no maculopathies. Lens exchange was performed with CALLISTO eye (Zeiss). For each patient, the expected postoperative residual refraction was calculated depending on three different corneal parameters of two different devices: standard K-front (K) and total keratometry (TK) obtained by a swept-source-OCT-assisted biometry system (IOL Master 700, Zeiss) as well as total corneal refractive power (TCRP) obtained by a Scheimpflug device (Pentacam AXL, Oculus). Barrett’s formula for toric intraocular lenses was used for all calculations within a novel software platform (EQ workplace, Zeiss FORUM ® ). Results were statistically compared with postoperative refraction calculated according to the Harris dioptric power matrix. Results The standard K values (mean PE 0.02 D ± 0.45 D) and TK values (mean PE 0.09 D ± 0.43 D) of the IOL Master 700 reached similar results ( p = 0.96). 78% of eyes in both K and TK groups achieved SE within ±0.5 D of attempted correction and all eyes (100%) were within ±1.0 D of attempted correction in both groups. By contrast, the prediction error in the IOL calculation using the TCRP of the Scheimpflug device was significantly greater (mean PE −0.56 D ± 0.49 D; p = 0.00 vs. standard K and p = 0.00 vs. TK) with adjusted refractive indices. Thirty-nine and Ninety-one percentage of eyes in the TCRP group achieved SE within ±0.5 D ( p = 0.008 K vs. TCRP and p = 0.005 TK vs. TCRP) and ± 1.0 D ( p = 0.14 vs. TCRP) of attempted correction, respectively. Conclusion All three corneal parameters (standard K, TK, TCRP) performed well in calculating toric IOLs. The most accurate refractive outcomes in toric IOL implantation were achieved by IOL calculations based on swept-source-OCT-assisted biometry. The SS-OCT-based K-front and TK values achieve comparable results in the calculation of toric IOLs.

Comparison of corneal topography maps obtained using the IOLMaster 700 ® and the Anterion ® in candidates for toric IOL implantation

Comparison of keratometry using SS-OCT and dual Scheimpflug-Placido imaging in postmyopic corneal refractive surgery eyes

Agreement between swept-source optical biometry and Scheimpflug-based tomography in eyes with previous myopic refractive surgery

Repeatability of total Keratometry and standard Keratometry by the IOLMaster 700 and comparison to total corneal astigmatism by Scheimpflug imaging

Total keratometry for toric intraocular lens calculation: comparison from two swept-source optical coherence tomography biometers

Evaluating keratometry and corneal astigmatism data from biometers and anterior segment tomographers and mapping to reconstructed corneal astigmatism

Bilateral Comparison of Conventional Versus Topographic-guided Customized Ablation for Myopic LASIK with the NIDEK EC-5000

Comparison of ocular biometric parameters between two swept-source optical coherence tomography devices and Scheimpflug tomography in patients with cataract

Comparison of ocular variables obtained from Tomey OA-2000 and IOLMaster

Comparison of Corneal Topography after Topography-Guided FS-LASIK and Wavefront-Optimized FS-LASIK

Comparison of Total Corneal Astigmatism Between IOLMaster and Pentacam

Comparative Evaluation of Topographic Parameters Using Three Different Topographers in Keratoconic and Cross-linked Keratoconic Corneas

Comparing refractive outcomes of a standard industry toric IOL calculator using anterior corneal astigmatism and total corneal refractive power

Comparison of the IOL Master and Pentacam in the measurement of anterior segment parameters in patients with high myopia and cataracts

Comparison of corneal topography measurement tool and its clinical application

Comparing the Postoperative Outcomes of Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments in Three Different Topographic Patterns of Eccentric Keratoconus

Accuracy of toric intraocular lens power calculation depending on different keratometry values using a novel network based software platform

Comparison of toric intraocular lens calculation with the integrated K method and three single biometric devices

A comparison of white-to-white measurements obtained by Anterion AS-OCT versus three optical devices in refractive surgery candidates

Comparison of Vault Measurements Using a Swept-Source OCT-Based Optical Biometer and Anterior Segment OCT

Evaluation of Selected Biometric Parameters in Cataract Patients-A Comparison between Argos® and IOLMaster 700®: Two Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Biometers