Abstract:Ventilation is an important measure to prevent the transmission of COVID-19 in indoor environment. The protection effect of personalized ventilation in disease control has been preliminarily verified in previous studies. It is considered as one of the promising measures to control airborne transmission indoors due to its high ventilation efficiency with direct delivery of fresh and clean air to the occupant's breathing zone. Especially for vehicles like aircrafts and coaches, in which the personalized ventilation has been used for years, its applications in COVID-19 epidemic control should be further explored. However, most of the present airborne infection risk prediction models are based on the assumption that the exhaled pathogens are evenly distributed in the room. The non-uniform distribution of pathogens in indoor environment cannot be accurately predicted with these models when applying localized ventilation or considering the short-ranged transmission of airborne pathogens. In this study, five different non-uniform risk assessment models were verified by the tracer particle experiments with thermal manikins. The assessment methods included exposure risk index (epsilon(bz)), personal exposure effectiveness (PEE), intake fraction (IF), dose-response model (P(t)) and infection risk reduction ratio (eta). Two breathing thermal manikins were used to simulate two seated passengers in public transportation placed side by side. The nebulized aerosols with similar size distribution to human breathing were released from the source manikin's mouth. The concentration of the received particles at the receptor's breathing zone was sampled with an aerodynamic particle sizer (APS). The receptor's exposure level of droplets released by the exhalation of the infector was predicted accordingly considering the usage patterns of the personalized ventilation. The applicability of each model for predicting the risk of airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 was discussed. The results show that the five assessment methods are all based on the measurement results of the droplet concentration in the breathing zone of the exposed occupant. These models can predict the intervention effect of personalized ventilation on the airborne exposure or infection risk, and the trends of the predicted results are basically consistent. The relative exposure level can be predicted by exposure risk index epsilon(bz), PEE and IF, which can be used to simply assess the exposure risk of SARS-CoV-2. The dose-response model can directly assess the infection risk of specific airborne disease such as COVID-19, but only when the viability and infectivity of the virus are accurately determined. And infection risk index. can evaluate the infection risk reduction ratio due to the use of personalized ventilation. These assessment methods can all reflect the problems of risk increase caused by lateral spread and accelerated diffusion of the droplet-laden air due to the application of personalized ventilation to the infector. The protective effect for the exposed occupant can also be evaluated by these models when PV is used for the receptor. The exposure risk of the receptor can be lowered by using the personalized ventilation and the protection effect is increased by using higher volume of clean air. This study can provide support and reference for the evaluation and development of novel ventilation methods for airborne disease control in indoor environment and provide basis for assessment of the transmission risk of COVID-19 under non-uniform conditions.

Evaluating risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection of the elderly in the public bus under personalized air supply

Disease transmission through expiratory aerosols on an urban bus

Passenger-to-Car Assignment Optimization Model for High-Speed Railway with Risk of COVID-19 Transmission Consideration

Transmission of COVID-19 Viral Particles and the Risk of Infection among Passengers in Air-Conditioned Buses

Transmission of Pathogen-Laden Expiratory Droplets in a Coach Bus

Estimation of the SARS-CoV-2 transmission probability in confined traffic space and evaluation of the mitigation strategies

CFD Evaluation of Respiratory Particle Dispersion and Associated Infection Risk in a Coach Bus with Different Ventilation Configurations

Evaluating infection risks in buses based on passengers' dynamic temporal and typical spatial scenarios: A case study of COVID-19

Evaluation of indoor environmental quality, personal cumulative exposure dose, and aerosol transmission risk levels inside urban buses in Dalian, China

Characteristics of human-related droplet dynamic patterns inside urban bus with numerical simulation approach: Impacts of solar radiation, ventilation modes and humidity

Multi-scale risk assessment and mitigations comparison for COVID-19 in urban public transport: A combined field measurement and modeling approach

An advanced numerical model for the assessment of airborne transmission of influenza in bus microenvironments

Effects of purifiers on the airborne transmission of droplets inside a bus

Effects of HVAC Settings and Windows Open or Close on the SARS-CoV-2 Virus Transmission Inside a Mass Transit System Bus

Air exchange rates and advection-diffusion of CO2 and aerosols in a route bus for evaluation of infection risk

Numerical study of when and who will get infected by coronavirus in passenger car

Exposure risk analysis of COVID-19 for a ride-sharing motorbike taxi

Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in Public Transportation Vehicles: A Case Study in Hunan Province, China

Non-uniform Risk Assessment Methods for Personalized Ventilation on Prevention and Control of COVID-19

On the utility of a well-mixed model for predicting disease transmission on an urban bus

Risk evaluation of respiratory droplet dispersion in high-speed train compartments with different air circulation systems