Missing the Match: A National Survey Investigating Education in Renal Donor-Recipient Matching

Ingrid Woelfel,Austin Schenk,Ashley Limkemann,Emily Huang,Shareef Syed
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.01.047
IF: 1.014
2024-02-11
Transplantation Proceedings
Abstract:Purpose Clinical judgment in renal donor organ and recipient selection is gained through fellowship and mentorship in early career. We aim to understand the past and current state of organ acceptance education. Methods We developed and distributed an anonymous, national survey to American Society of Transplant Surgeons faculty members and transplant surgery fellows in 2022. Survey questions explored in detail the evaluation of organ offers, the extent of formal education in organ evaluation, and attitudes regarding training adequacy. Findings Ninety-eight attending surgeons (65 men, 25 women, and 3 nonbinary) and 38 fellows (25 men, 6 women, and 2 nonbinary) responded. Seventy-eight percent of attending surgeons and 6% of fellows take primary organ offers. Forty-four percent of fellows report no didactic education in donor evaluation and recipient selection. Fellows report that discussion with attending surgeons (37.2%) and independent study of the literature (35.4%) are their primary modes of learning. Fellows call for additional clinical decision-making experience (47.3%), further didactic sessions (44.7%), and additional discussions with faculty (44.7%). Sixty-four percent of fellows and 55% of attendings felt their training provided adequate education about donor selection. Conclusion Our responses suggest gaps in education regarding donor and recipient selection. Increased clinical experience and standardized education at the national level represent opportunities for improvement.
immunology,surgery,transplantation
What problem does this paper attempt to address?