Abstract:The evolution of cooperation has been a perennial problem in evolutionary biology because cooperation can be undermined by selfish cheaters who gain an advantage in the short run, while compromising the long-term viability of the population. Evolutionary game theory has shown that under certain conditions, cooperation nonetheless evolves stably, for example if players have the opportunity to punish cheaters that benefit from a public good yet refuse to pay into the common pool. However, punishment has remained enigmatic because it is costly and difficult to maintain. On the other hand, cooperation emerges naturally in the public goods game if the synergy of the public good (the factor multiplying the public good investment) is sufficiently high. In terms of this synergy parameter, the transition from defection to cooperation can be viewed as a phase transition with the synergy as the critical parameter. We show here that punishment reduces the critical value at which cooperation occurs, but also creates the possibility of meta-stable phase transitions, where populations can 'tunnel' into the cooperating phase below the critical value. At the same time, cooperating populations are unstable even above the critical value, because a group of defectors that are large enough can 'nucleate' such a transition. We study the mean-field theoretical predictions via agent-based simulations of finite populations using an evolutionary approach where the decisions to cooperate or to punish are encoded genetically in terms of evolvable probabilities. We recover the theoretical predictions and demonstrate that the population shows hysteresis, as expected in systems that exhibit super-heating and super-cooling. We conclude that punishment can stabilize populations of cooperators below the critical point, but it is a two-edged sword: it can also stabilize defectors above the critical point.

Punishment can promote defection in group-structured populations

Structured populations facilitate cooperation in policed Public Goods Games

Self-organization of punishment in structured populations

When is altruistic punishment useful in social dilemmas?

Promote or hinder? The role of punishment in the emergence of cooperation

Joint effects of voluntary participation and group selection on the evolution of altruistic punishment

The evolution of punishing institutions

The evolution of cooperation in voluntary public goods game with shared-punishment

Second-order freeriding on antisocial punishment restores the effectiveness of prosocial punishment

Altruistic punishment in humans

Punishing Just in Time: Public Cooperation and Economies of Scale

When Costly Punishment Becomes Evolutionarily Beneficial

People punish defection, not failures to conform to the majority

Punishment in public goods games leads to meta-stable phase transitions and hysteresis

Severe Punishment for Those Who Were Caught

Decoupling cooperation and punishment in humans shows that punishment is not an altruistic trait

Effects of punishment driven by inequity aversion on promoting cooperation in public goods games

Rare but Severe Concerted Punishment That Favors Cooperation.

Effectiveness of conditional punishment for the evolution of public cooperation

Mercenary punishment in structured populations

Exploring the Evolution of Altruistic Punishment with a PDE Model of Cultural Multilevel Selection