Efficiency Measurement in Healthcare: The Foundations, Variables, and Models – A Narrative Literature Review

Antony Andrews,Grigorios Emvalomatis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/econ-2022-0062
2024-01-01
ECONOMICS
Abstract:Abstract Efficiency and productivity analysis have been critical in healthcare and economics literature. Despite the tremendous innovation in methodology and data availability, a comprehensive literature review on this topic has not been conducted recently. This article provides a three-part literature review of healthcare efficiency and productivity studies. It begins by reviewing the two primary empirical methods used in healthcare efficiency studies, emphasising the treatment of inefficiency persistence. Second, previous contributions to healthcare productivity research are discussed with a focus on methodology and findings. In the third section, various measures of outputs, inputs, and prices in health literature are explored to determine the extent of consensus in the literature. On the methodological front, the literature review shows that while the Data Envelopment Analysis and the Stochastic Frontier Analysis have been used extensively in healthcare productivity and efficiency studies, their application in the context of longitudinal data is limited. Further, no study currently undertakes to measure the TFP changes and its components that use both primal and dual approaches. There is also a considerable variation in the use of inputs, outputs, and price variables, suggesting that the use of variables in healthcare productivity and efficiency literature rests on the balance between data availability and the research scope.
economics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper primarily reviews the literature on efficiency and productivity measurement in the healthcare sector. The authors first introduce two main empirical approaches - Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA), emphasizing the issue of handling efficiency persistence. Next, the paper discusses previous contributions to healthcare productivity research, particularly in terms of methodology and findings. Finally, it explores various measures of outputs, inputs, and prices in the health literature to determine the level of consensus in the literature. DEA and SFA are widely applied in healthcare efficiency research, but DEA has limitations in handling long-term data and random shocks, while SFA faces challenges in assumptions and normative aspects despite its ability to distinguish between inefficiency and random fluctuations. Nevertheless, both approaches remain the most commonly used tools in healthcare research. The paper points out that there is currently no study that simultaneously uses primal and dual methods to measure changes in Total Factor Productivity (TFP) and its components. The paper also discusses improvements in dealing with sensitivity of efficiency scores in DEA and SFA, such as the application of the Bootstrap method. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of dynamic models in considering efficiency persistence, which allows for the relationship between short-term and long-term efficiency, although the application of dynamic models in healthcare efficiency research is relatively limited. Furthermore, the paper provides an overview of previous contributions to healthcare TFP research, highlighting the application of index numbers methods (such as the Malmquist Productivity Index) and econometric techniques (such as SFA) in decomposing productivity changes. While the Malmquist index is common, its application faces challenges posed by policy changes and data collection practices. Lastly, the paper lists the output variables commonly used in healthcare efficiency and productivity research, noting the complexity of using health outcomes as measurement criteria. In summary, the paper aims to address the latest developments in healthcare efficiency and productivity measurement, as well as the limitations of existing methods and future research directions.