Abstract:Purpose Agency theory postulates that research and development (R&D) investments are subject to managerial discretion and thus may not enhance firm value as expected. The inconclusive empirical findings in the literature is a testament of that. This paper aims to investigate the interplay between board gender diversity (i.e. women on boards) and value relevance of firms' effort to innovate as indicated by firms' R&D investments. Design/methodology/approach Through a sample of 1,626 US-listed firms from the period 2004 to 2019, the authors examine whether board gender diversity promotes or hampers value relevance of firms' efforts to innovate. The authors use ordinary least squares as the baseline model and address potential endogeneity through instrumental variable two-stage least square, and selection bias through Heckman selection model. Finally, the authors use the financial crisis of 2008 as a natural experiment to investigate the effect of board gender diversity during the crisis period. Findings The results show that board gender diversity positively moderates the relation between R&D and firm value. In times of financial crisis, R&D does not destroy firm value in firms with gender diverse board. The results are robust to measurement error, endogeneity issue, particularly simultaneity and selection bias. Practical implications The findings in this study have several practical implications. Firms that invest heavily in R&D should be mindful of gender diversity in their board recruitment strategies to enhance innovation outputs and firm value. Current and potential investors (i.e. shareholders) should take into consideration board gender diversity in their investment decision-making processes as the results show that gender diverse boards promote more effective governance, which, in turn, leads to better alignment of R&D investments with shareholder value. Regulators aiming to improve corporate governance policies should encourage gender diversity on the boards. The results align with global initiatives such as the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, particularly Goal 5 on gender equality. Policymakers may use the findings in this study to advocate for more gender diverse governance structures within corporations. Originality/value This study investigates the role gender diverse boards play in creating value from firms' R&D activities.

Bank board diversity on risk and value: evidence from Taiwan

Board Gender Diversity and Cost of Equity: Evidence from Mandatory Female Board Representation

Board Gender Diversity,Managerial Power and Demand for External Audit

Women's Leadership and Corporate Performance

Corporate Board Gender Diversity and Financing Decision

Does board diversity influence idiosyncratic risk: Empirical evidence from Chinese listed firms

Bank Diversification and Financial Constraints on Firm Investment Decisions in a Bank-Based Financial System

Board Diversity and Corporate Innovation: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms

Corporate Governance, Financial Innovation and Performance: Evidence from Taiwan’s Banking Industry

Do 'Lehman Sisters' work in China? Women on boards and bank risk

Board Diversity, Firm Risk, and Corporate Policies

Does board diversity reduce the probability of financial distress? Evidence from Chinese firms

Does gender diversity matter for risk-taking? Evidence from Italian financial institutions

Board Gender Diversity and Dividend Policy in Chinese Listed Firms

When R&D investment improves firm value: the role of board gender diversity

Board tenure diversity, culture and firm risk: Cross-country evidence

Diversification, corporate governance, regulation and bank risk-taking

Bank Geographic Diversification and Systemic Risk

The impact of diversification on the profitability and risk of Chinese banks: evidence from a semiparametric approach

Gender diversity and bank risk-taking: an empirical investigation in Italy

Does Diversity of Financial Services Really Improve Bank's Performance?