Life cycle assessment of wind turbine blade recycling approaches in the United States
Evan Sproul,Michelle Williams,Mitchell L. Rencheck,Matthew Korey,Brandon L. Ennis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1293/1/012027
2023-11-29
IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering
Abstract:Most wind turbine blades reaching end-of-life are sent to landfill where embedded cost, energy, and materials are lost. To avoid landfilling future blades, a broad range of recycling and material recovery approaches have been proposed as solutions in the U.S., each with benefits, challenges, and varying levels of technical maturity. The approaches include 1) cement co-processing, 2) mechanical recycling, 3) pyrolysis, 4) microwave pyrolysis and 5) solvolysis. While these approaches are all capable of recovering various forms of materials for use in secondary markets, there are trade-offs between material circularity, reducing harmful environmental emissions, and cost-effectiveness for the U.S. market. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a critical step needed to compare these trade-offs and determine where future research and development should be focused. As a result, some previous LCA has been performed on recycling approaches. However, attempts to quantify and compare greenhouse gas emissions across a broad range of technologies have been limited, particularly within the U.S. market where landfill availability and costs do not hinder disposing of wind blades. This work addresses this limitation by presenting a detailed comparison of LCA greenhouse gas emissions and material yields from a range of wind turbine blade recycling approaches in the U.S. The LCA presented in this work includes baseline results, as well as a variety of sensitivity and scenario analyses that look at the impact of process modelling uncertainty, future energy mixes, and other critical input parameters. Overall, results show that mechanical recycling and microwave pyrolysis have the lowest net greenhouse gas emissions. However, the value of mechanically recycled materials is highly uncertain, as mechanical recycling generates a mixed feedstock that may underperform compared to virgin materials. Cement co-processing has higher net emissions than mechanical recycling or microwave pyrolysis but does generate a value-added feedstock that offsets virgin material from mining for cement production. Other advanced thermal and chemical recycling methods such as pyrolysis and solvolysis have higher net emissions due to increased energy consumption but are also highly sensitive to thermal energy sources within the model.