Die Psychosomatik des chronischen Rückenschmerzes

P. Henningsen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-003-0615-y

2004-05-01

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Biomaterial-mediated Delivery of Microenvironmental Cues for Repair and Regeneration of Articular Cartilage.

Wei Seong Toh,Myron Spector,Eng Hin Lee,Tong Cao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/mp100437a

2011-01-01

Molecular Pharmaceutics

Abstract:Articular cartilage injuries are one of the most challenging problems in musculoskeletal medicine due to the poor intrinsic regenerative capacity of this tissue. The lack of efficient treatment modalities motivates research into tissue engineering: combining cells, biomaterials mimicking extracellular matrix (scaffolds) and microenvironmental signaling cues. The aim of this review is to focus on the use of biomaterials as delivery systems for microenvironmental cues in relation to their applications for treatment of cartilage defects. The latest advances in cartilage tissue engineering and regeneration are critically reviewed to demonstrate an outline of challenges toward biomaterial-based approaches of cartilage regeneration.
Scaffold Design and in Vitro Study of Osteochondral Coculture in a Three-Dimensional Porous Polycaprolactone Scaffold Fabricated by Fused Deposition Modeling.

T Cao,KH Ho,SH Teoh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/10763270360697012

2003-01-01

Tissue Engineering

Abstract:Tissue engineering offers an alternative method that can overcome some of the existing drawbacks of current articular defect repair methods because articular cartilage has a limited capacity to respond to injury. The solution may lie in the design of a three-dimensional load-bearing scaffold. Here we describe the tissue engineering of an osteochondral construct by coculturing osteogenic cells and chondrogenic cells on a three-dimenisonal load-bearing bioresorbable polymer scaffold. Porous polycaprolactone scaffolds were designed and fabricated via fused deposition modeling. Osteogenic cells were seeded and precultured in one-half of the partitioned scaffolds. Chondrogenic cells were later seeded into the other half. The cell-seeded scaffolds were cultured in a coculture medium. Both cell types proliferated, migrated, linked in their scaffold compartments, and integrated at the interface. Osteoblasts; and chondrocytes produced different extracellular matrices in each scaffold compartment. Mineralized nodules deposited in the osteogenic cell seeded compartment. High osteocalcin was detected in precultured osteogenic cell supernatant and high alkaline phosphatase was detected in the coculture supernatant of osteochondral constructs. This study suggests that a tissue-engineered osteochondral construct with a three-dimenisonal polycaprolactone scaffold has the potential for osteochondral defect repair.
Osteochondral Tissue Engineering Dilemma: Scaffolding Trends in Regenerative Medicine

Faiza Ramzan,Asmat Salim,Irfan Khan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12015-023-10545-x

Abstract:Orthopedic surgeons face a lot of difficulties in managing and repairing osteochondral defects. Damaged articular cartilage and the subchondral bone underneath are both present in osteochondral defects. The demands of the bone, cartilage, and the contact between the bone and the cartilage must be taken into consideration while repairing an osteochondral defect. Only palliative, not curative, therapeutic interventions are now available for the healing of osteochondral abnormalities. With its ability to successfully rebuild bone, cartilage, and the junction between bone and cartilage, tissue engineering has been recognized as an effective substitute. In correlation, mechanical stress and physical processes are commonly applied to the osteochondral area. Therefore, the ability of chondrocytes and osteoblasts to regenerate is influenced by bioactive molecules and the physicochemical characteristics of the surrounding matrix. The treatment of osteochondral disorders is said to benefit from the use of stem cells as an alternative intervention. In the field of tissue engineering, various approaches have been used such as the direct implantation of scaffolding materials at the site of tissue injury in patients, either alone or loaded with cells and bioactive molecules at the target site to imitate the natural extracellular matrix. Despite the extensive use and advancements of tissue-engineered biomaterials such as natural and synthetic polymer-based scaffolds, their repair capacity is limited due to challenges in combating antigenicity, designed to simulate in vivo microenvironment, and conducting mechanical or metabolic characteristics comparable to native organs/tissues. This study explores numerous osteochondral tissue engineering methodologies focusing on scaffold design, material varieties, manufacturing techniques, and functional features. This review is focused on recent breakthroughs in bioactive scaffolds that aid osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation for bone and cartilage repair. The topic will cover fundamental anatomy, osteochondral repair methodologies and obstacles, cell selection, biochemical variables, and bioactive materials, as well as the design and manufacture of bioactive scaffolds. Additionally, we focus on the concept and construction of decellularized scaffolds, and the fabrication of dECM scaffolds in tissue engineering from various skin, bone, nerve, heart tissue, lung, liver, and kidney, and their application in osteochondral regeneration.
3D Printing of Biomimetic Multi-Layered GelMA/nHA Scaffold for Osteochondral Defect Repair

Jingyi Liu,Liang Li,Hairui Suo,Mengling Yan,Jun Yin,Jianzhong Fu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107708

IF: 9.417

2019-01-01

Materials & Design

Abstract:Currently, osteochondral defects frequently cause limited motion and impaired function of the joint, leading to serious healthcare problems, and it is still very challenging to realize the simultaneous regeneration of subchondral bone with cartilage. In the current study, we designed a tri-layered scaffold and fabricated it using the extrusion-based multi-nozzle 3D printing technology. The bioinks used for 3D printing included a 15% methacrylated gelatin (GelMA) hydrogel for cartilage on top layer, a combination of 20% GelMA and 3% nanohydroxyapatite (nHA) (20/3% GelMA/nHA) hydrogel for interfacial layer, and a 30/3% GelMA/nHA hydrogel for subchondral bone at bottom layer. The water absorption capacity, biodegradation, and mechanical properties of hydrogels and scaffolds were characterized, and in vitro assay with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) was performed to indicate the biocompatibility of scaffolds. Based on the results of in vivo repair of rabbit osteochondral defect, the neo-tissues in defects integrated better with the surrounding tissues, the joint surface of the defects was smoother, and more cartilage-specific extracellular matrix and collagen type II were observed using the tri-layered scaffolds. This study not only provides a potential manufacturing method for multi-layered scaffolds, but also is helpful for understanding the regeneration mechanism of cartilage-subchondral bone.
Scaffold-Based Tissue Engineering Strategies for Osteochondral Repair

Jiang-Nan Fu,Xing Wang,Meng Yang,You-Rong Chen,Ji-Ying Zhang,Rong-Hui Deng,Zi-Ning Zhang,Jia-Kuo Yu,Fu-Zhen Yuan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.812383

IF: 5.7

2022-01-11

Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology

Abstract:Over centuries, several advances have been made in osteochondral (OC) tissue engineering to regenerate more biomimetic tissue. As an essential component of tissue engineering, scaffolds provide structural and functional support for cell growth and differentiation. Numerous scaffold types, such as porous, hydrogel, fibrous, microsphere, metal, composite and decellularized matrix, have been reported and evaluated for OC tissue regeneration in vitro and in vivo , with respective advantages and disadvantages. Unfortunately, due to the inherent complexity of organizational structure and the objective limitations of manufacturing technologies and biomaterials, we have not yet achieved stable and satisfactory effects of OC defects repair. In this review, we summarize the complicated gradients of natural OC tissue and then discuss various osteochondral tissue engineering strategies, focusing on scaffold design with abundant cell resources, material types, fabrication techniques and functional properties.

multidisciplinary sciences
Functional biomaterials for cartilage regeneration.

Zigang Ge,Chao Li,Boon Chin Heng,Guoxin Cao,Zheng Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34147

2012-01-01

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A

Abstract:The injury and degeneration of articular cartilage and associated arthritis are leading causes of disability worldwide. Cartilage tissue engineering as a treatment modality for cartilage defects has been investigated for over 20 years. Various scaffold materials have been developed for this purpose, but has yet to achieve feasibility and effectiveness for widespread clinical use. Currently, the regeneration of articular cartilage remains a formidable challenge, due to the complex physiology of cartilage tissue and its poor healing capacity. Although intensive research has been focused on the developmental biology and regeneration of cartilage tissue and a diverse plethora of biomaterials have been developed for this purpose, cartilage regeneration is still suboptimal, such as lacking a layered structure, mechanical mismatch with native cartilage and inadequate integration between native tissue and implanted scaffold. The ideal scaffold material should have versatile properties that actively contribute to cartilage regeneration. Functional scaffold materials may overcome the various challenges faced in cartilage tissue engineering by providing essential biological, mechanical, and physical/chemical signaling cues through innovative design. This review thus focuses on the complex structure of native articular cartilage, the critical properties of scaffolds required for cartilage regeneration, present strategies for scaffold design, and future directions for cartilage regeneration with functional scaffold materials.
Advancing Scaffold-Assisted Modality for In Situ Osteochondral Regeneration: A Shift From Biodegradable to Bioadaptable

Han Wu,Xuejing Wang,Guocheng Wang,Guangyin Yuan,Weitao Jia,Liangfei Tian,Yufeng Zheng,Wenjiang Ding,Jia Pei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202407040

2024-08-06

Abstract:Over the decades, the management of osteochondral lesions remains a significant yet unmet medical challenge without curative solutions to date. Owing to the complex nature of osteochondral units with multi-tissues and multicellularity, and inherently divergent cellular turnover capacities, current clinical practices often fall short of robust and satisfactory repair efficacy. Alternative strategies, particularly tissue engineering assisted with biomaterial scaffolds, achieve considerable advances, with the emerging pursuit of a more cost-effective approach of in situ osteochondral regeneration, as evolving toward cell-free modalities. By leveraging endogenous cell sources and innate regenerative potential facilitated with instructive scaffolds, promising results are anticipated and being evidenced. Accordingly, a paradigm shift is occurring in scaffold development, from biodegradable and biocompatible to bioadaptable in spatiotemporal control. Hence, this review summarizes the ongoing progress in deploying bioadaptable criteria for scaffold-based engineering in endogenous osteochondral repair, with emphases on precise control over the scaffolding material, degradation, structure and biomechanics, and surface and biointerfacial characteristics, alongside their distinguished impact on the outcomes. Future outlooks of a highlight on advanced, frontier materials, technologies, and tools tailoring precision medicine and smart healthcare are provided, which potentially paves the path toward the ultimate goal of complete osteochondral regeneration with function restoration.
Biomimetic Design and Fabrication of Multilayered Osteochondral Scaffolds by Low-Temperature Deposition Manufacturing and Thermal-Induced Phase-Separation Techniques

Ting Zhang,Hefeng Zhang,Laquan Zhang,Shuaijun Jia,Jian Liu,Zhuo Xiong,Wei Sun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa7078

2017-01-01

Biofabrication

Abstract:Integrative osteochondral repair is a useful strategy for cartilage-defect repair. To mimic the microenvironment, it is necessary that scaffolds effectively mimic the extracellular matrix of natural cartilage and subchondral bone. In this study, biomimetic osteochondral scaffolds containing an oriented cartilage layer, a compact layer, and a three-dimensional (3D)-printed core-sheath structured-bone layer were developed. The oriented cartilage layer was designed to mimic the structural and material characteristics of native cartilage tissue and was fabricated with cartilage matrix-chitosan materials, using thermal-induced phase-separation technology. The 3D-printed core-sheath structured-bone layer was fabricated with poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide)/β-tricalcium phosphate-collagen materials by low-temperature deposition technology, using a specially designed core-sheath nozzle, and was designed to mimic the mechanical characteristics of subchondral bone and improve scaffold hydrophilicity. The compact layer was designed to mimic the calcified-layer structure of natural cartilage to ensure the presence of different suitable microenvironments for the regeneration of bone and cartilage. A dissolving-bonding process was developed to effectively combine the three parts together, after which the bone and cartilage scaffolds exhibited good mechanical properties and hydrophilicity. Additionally, goat autologous bone mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) were isolated and then seeded into the bone and cartilage layers, respectively, and following a 1 week culture in vitro, the BMSC-scaffold constructs were implanted into a goat articular-defect model. Our results indicated that the scaffolds exhibited good biocompatibility, and 24 weeks after implantation, the femoral condyle surface was relatively flat and consisted of a large quantity of hyaloid cartilage. Furthermore, histological staining revealed regenerated trabecular bone formed in the subchondral bone-defect area. These results provided a new method to fabricate biomimetic osteochondral scaffolds and demonstrated their effectiveness for future clinical applications in cartilage-defect repair.
Cellular therapy and tissue engineering for cartilage repair

A Zelinka,A J Roelofs,R A Kandel,C De Bari

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2022.07.012

Abstract:Articular cartilage (AC) has limited capacity for repair. The first attempt to repair cartilage using tissue engineering was reported in 1977. Since then, cell-based interventions have entered clinical practice in orthopaedics, and several tissue engineering approaches to repair cartilage are in the translational pipeline towards clinical application. Classically, these involve a scaffold, substrate or matrix to provide structure, and cells such as chondrocytes or mesenchymal stromal cells to generate the tissue. We discuss the advantages and drawbacks of the use of various cell types, natural and synthetic scaffolds, multiphasic or gradient-based scaffolds, and self-organizing or self-assembling scaffold-free systems, for the engineering of cartilage constructs. Several challenges persist including achieving zonal tissue organization and integration with the surrounding tissue upon implantation. Approaches to improve cartilage thickness, organization and mechanical properties include mechanical stimulation, culture under hypoxic conditions, and stimulation with growth factors or other macromolecules. In addition, advanced technologies such as bioreactors, biosensors and 3D bioprinting are actively being explored. Understanding the underlying mechanisms of action of cell therapy and tissue engineering approaches will help improve and refine therapy development. Finally, we discuss recent studies of the intrinsic cellular and molecular mechanisms of cartilage repair that have identified novel signals and targets and are inspiring the development of molecular therapies to enhance the recruitment and cartilage reparative activity of joint-resident stem and progenitor cells. A one-fits-all solution is unrealistic, and identifying patients who will respond to a specific targeted treatment will be critical.
Applications of Biocompatible Scaffold Materials in Stem Cell-Based Cartilage Tissue Engineering

Xia Zhao,Daniel A. Hu,Di Wu,Fang He,Hao Wang,Linjuan Huang,Deyao Shi,Qing Liu,Na Ni,Mikhail Pakvasa,Yongtao Zhang,Kai Fu,Kevin H. Qin,Alexander J. Li,Ofir Hagag,Eric J. Wang,Maya Sabharwal,William Wagstaff,Russell R. Reid,Michael J. Lee,Jennifer Moriatis Wolf,Mostafa El Dafrawy,Kelly Hynes,Jason Strelzow,Sherwin H. Ho,Tong-Chuan He,Aravind Athiviraham

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.603444

IF: 5.7

2021-03-25

Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology

Abstract:Cartilage, especially articular cartilage, is a unique connective tissue consisting of chondrocytes and cartilage matrix that covers the surface of joints. It plays a critical role in maintaining joint durability and mobility by providing nearly frictionless articulation for mechanical load transmission between joints. Damage to the articular cartilage frequently results from sport-related injuries, systemic diseases, degeneration, trauma, or tumors. Failure to treat impaired cartilage may lead to osteoarthritis, affecting more than 25% of the adult population globally. Articular cartilage has a very low intrinsic self-repair capacity due to the limited proliferative ability of adult chondrocytes, lack of vascularization and innervation, slow matrix turnover, and low supply of progenitor cells. Furthermore, articular chondrocytes are encapsulated in low-nutrient, low-oxygen environment. While cartilage restoration techniques such as osteochondral transplantation, autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), and microfracture have been used to repair certain cartilage defects, the clinical outcomes are often mixed and undesirable. Cartilage tissue engineering (CTE) may hold promise to facilitate cartilage repair. Ideally, the prerequisites for successful CTE should include the use of effective chondrogenic factors, an ample supply of chondrogenic progenitors, and the employment of cell-friendly, biocompatible scaffold materials. Significant progress has been made on the above three fronts in past decade, which has been further facilitated by the advent of 3D bio-printing. In this review, we briefly discuss potential sources of chondrogenic progenitors. We then primarily focus on currently available chondrocyte-friendly scaffold materials, along with 3D bioprinting techniques, for their potential roles in effective CTE. It is hoped that this review will serve as a primer to bring cartilage biologists, synthetic chemists, biomechanical engineers, and 3D-bioprinting technologists together to expedite CTE process for eventual clinical applications.

multidisciplinary sciences
Scaffold-Dependent Mechanical and Architectural Cues Guide Osteochondral Defect Healing in silico

Martina Tortorici,Ansgar Petersen,Klara Ehrhart,Georg N. Duda,Sara Checa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.642217

IF: 5.7

2021-02-15

Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology

Abstract:Osteochondral defects in joints require surgical intervention to relieve pain and restore function. However, no current treatment enables a complete reconstitution of the articular surface. It is known that both mechanical and biological factors play a key role on osteochondral defect healing, however the underlying principles and how they can be used in the design of treatment strategies remain largely unknown. To unravel the underlying principles of mechanobiology in osteochondral defect healing, i.e., how mechanical stimuli can guide biological tissue formation, we employed a computational approach investigating the scaffold-associated mechanical and architectural properties that would enable a guided defect healing. A previous computer model of the knee joint was further developed to simulate healing of an empty osteochondral defect. Then, scaffolds were implanted in the defect and their architectures and material properties were systematically varied to identify their relevance in osteochondral defect healing. Scaffold mechanical and architectural properties were capable of influencing osteochondral defect healing. Specifically, scaffold material elastic modulus values in the range of cancellous bone (low GPa range) and a scaffold architecture that provided stability, i.e., resistance against displacement, in both the main loading direction and perpendicular to it supported the repair process. The here presented model, despite its simplifications, is regarded as a powerful tool to screen for promising properties of novel scaffold candidates fostering osteochondral defect regeneration prior to their implementation in vivo .

multidisciplinary sciences
Engineered Osteochondral Scaffolds with Bioactive Cartilage Zone for Enhanced Articular Cartilage Regeneration

Aleksandra A. Golebiowska,Jonathon T. Intravaia,Vinayak Sathe,Sangamesh G. Kumbar,Syam P. Nukavarapu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-024-03655-1

IF: 3.8

2024-11-28

Annals of Biomedical Engineering

Abstract:Despite progress, osteochondral (OC) tissue engineering strategies face limitations in terms of articular cartilage layer development and its integration with the underlying bone tissue. The main objective of this study is to develop a zonal OC scaffold with native biochemical signaling in the cartilage zone to promote articular cartilage development devoid of cells and growth factors. Herein, we report the development and in vivo assessment of a novel gradient and zonal-structured scaffold for OC defect regeneration. The scaffold system is composed of a mechanically supportive 3D-printed template containing decellularized cartilage extracellular matrix (ECM) biomaterial in the cartilage zone that possesses bioactive characteristics, such as chemotactic activity and native tissue biochemical composition. OC scaffolds with a bioactive cartilage zone were implanted in vivo in a rabbit osteochondral defect model and assessed for gross morphology, matrix deposition, cellular distribution, and overall tissue regeneration. The scaffold system supported recruitment and infiltration of host cells into the cartilage zone of the graft, which led to increased ECM deposition and physiologically relevant articular cartilage tissue formation. Semi-quantitative ICRS scoring (overall score double for OC scaffold with bioactive cartilage zone compared to PLA scaffold) further confirm the bioactive scaffold enhanced articular cartilage engineering. This strategy of designing bioactive scaffolds to promote endogenous cellular infiltration can be a much simpler and effective approach for OC tissue repair and regeneration.

engineering, biomedical
Designing Biomimetic 3D-Printed Osteochondral Scaffolds for Enhanced Load-Bearing Capacity

Robert Choe,Blake Kuzemchak,George Kotsanos,Eman Mirdamadi,Mary Sherry,Eoin Devoy,Tao Lowe,Jonathan D. Packer,John P. Fisher

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2023.0217

IF: 4.08

2024-03-13

Tissue Engineering Part A

Abstract:Osteoarthritis is a debilitating chronic joint disorder that affects millions of people worldwide. Since palliative and surgical treatments cannot completely regenerate hyaline cartilage within the articulating joint, osteochondral (OC) tissue engineering has been explored to heal these challenging defects. Using computational simulations and 3D printing, we aimed to build a strategy to fabricate OC scaffolds with enhanced biomechanics. First, computational simulations revealed that interfacial fibrils within a bilayer alter OC scaffold deformation patterns by redirecting load-induced stresses toward the top of the cartilage layer. Principal component analysis (PCA) revealed that scaffolds with 800 m long fibrils (scaffolds 8A-8H) possessed optimal biomechanical properties to withstand compression and shear forces. While compression testing indicated that OC scaffolds with 800 m fibrils did not have greater compressive moduli than other scaffolds, interfacial shear tests indicated that scaffold 8H possessed the greatest shear strength. Lastly, failure analysis demonstrated that yielding or buckling models describe interfacial fibril failure depending on fibril slenderness, S. Specifically for scaffolds with packing density n=6 and n=8, the yielding failure model fits experimental loads with S<10 while the buckling model fitted scaffolds with S>10 slenderness. The research presented here provides critical insights into designing 3D printed interfacial scaffolds with refined biomechanics toward improving OC tissue engineering outcomes.

cell biology,cell & tissue engineering,engineering, biomedical,materials science, biomaterials
Osteochondral scaffolds for early treatment of cartilage defects in osteoarthritic joints: from bench to clinic.

Maryam Tamaddon,Helena Gilja,Ling Wang,J Miguel Oliveira,Xiaodan Sun,Rongwei Tan,Chaozong Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-112X.2020.01.002

2020-01-01

Abstract:Osteoarthritis is a degenerative joint disease, typified by the loss in the quality of cartilage and bone at the interface of a synovial joint, resulting in pain, stiffness and reduced mobility. The current surgical treatment for advanced stages of the disease is joint replacement, where the non-surgical therapeutic options or less invasive surgical treatments are no longer effective. These are major surgical procedures which have a substantial impact on patients' quality of life and lifetime risk of requiring revision surgery. Treatments using regenerative methods such as tissue engineering methods have been established and are promising for the early treatment of cartilage degeneration in osteoarthritis joints. In this approach, 3-dimensional scaffolds (with or without cells) are employed to provide support for tissue growth. However, none of the currently available tissue engineering and regenerative medicine products promotes satisfactory durable regeneration of large cartilage defects. Herein, we discuss the current regenerative treatment options for cartilage and osteochondral (cartilage and underlying subchondral bone) defects in the articulating joints. We further identify the main hurdles in osteochondral scaffold development for achieving satisfactory and durable regeneration of osteochondral tissues. The evolution of the osteochondral scaffolds - from monophasic to multiphasic constructs - is overviewed and the osteochondral scaffolds that have progressed to clinical trials are examined with respect to their clinical performances and their potential impact on the clinical practices. Development of an osteochondral scaffold which bridges the gap between small defect treatment and joint replacement is still a grand challenge. Such scaffold could be used for early treatment of cartilage and osteochondral defects at early stage of osteoarthritis and could either negate or delay the need for joint replacements.
Innovative Tissue‐Engineered Strategies for Osteochondral Defect Repair and Regeneration: Current Progress and Challenges

Liangbin Zhou,Van Osch Gjvm,Jos Malda,Martin J Stoddart,Yuxiao Lai,R Geoff Richards,Kevin Ki-Wai Ho,Ling Qin,Van Osch GJVM,Martin J. Stoddart,R. Geoff Richards,Kevin Ki‐wai Ho

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202001008

IF: 10

2020-10-26

Advanced Healthcare Materials

Abstract:Clinical treatments for the repair of osteochondral defects (OCD) are merely palliative, not completely curative, and thus enormously unfulfilled challenges. With the in‐depth studies of biology, medicine, materials, and engineering technology, the conception of OCD repair and regeneration should be renewed. During the past decades, many innovative tissue‐engineered approaches for repairing and regenerating damaged osteochondral units have been widely explored. Various scaffold‐free and scaffold‐based strategies, such as monophasic, biphasic, and currently fabricated multiphasic and gradient architectures have been proposed and evaluated. Meanwhile, progenitor cells and tissue‐specific cells have also been intensively investigated in vivo as well as ex vivo. Concerning bioactive factors and drugs, they have been combined with scaffolds and/or living cells, and even released in a spatiotemporally controlled manner. Although tremendous progress has been achieved, further research and development (R&D) is needed to convert preclinical outcomes into clinical applications. Here, the osteochondral unit structure, its defect classifications, and diagnosis are summarized. Commonly used clinical reparative techniques, tissue‐engineered strategies, emerging 3D‐bioprinting technologies, and the status of their clinical applications are discussed. Existing challenges to translation are also discussed and potential solutions for future R&D directions are proposed.

nanoscience & nanotechnology,engineering, biomedical,materials science, biomaterials
Engineered biochemical cues of regenerative biomaterials to enhance endogenous stem/progenitor cells (ESPCs)-mediated articular cartilage repair

Liangbin Zhou,Jietao Xu,Andrea Schwab,Wenxue Tong,Jiankun Xu,Lizhen Zheng,Ye Li,Zhuo Li,Shunxiang Xu,Ziyi Chen,Li Zou,Xin Zhao,Gerjo J.V.M. van Osch,Chunyi Wen,Ling Qin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.03.008

IF: 18.9

2023-05-04

Bioactive Materials

Abstract:Highlights • Numerous joint-resident ESPCs and chemokines, cytokines, and growth factors (CCGs) play critical roles in cartilage regeneration. • Acellular regenerative biomaterials-based ESPCs-mediated cartilage repair exhibits several superiorities over endogenous cartilage healing and in vitro -manipulated cell-based therapies. • Favorable exogenous biochemical cues have been shown to guide and magnify the roles of ESPCs. • To date, we cannot conclude which biochemical cue or combination has the most stimulative effect due to the lack of standardized comparison in the preclinical studies. • Combining cell-free regenerative scaffolds with engineered biochemical cues still represents one of the most promising strategies for cartilage repair. As a highly specialized shock-absorbing connective tissue, articular cartilage (AC) has very limited self-repair capacity after traumatic injuries, posing a heavy socioeconomic burden. Common clinical therapies for small- to medium-size focal AC defects are well-developed endogenous repair and cell-based strategies, including microfracture, mosaicplasty, autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), and matrix-induced ACI (MACI). However, these treatments frequently result in mechanically inferior fibrocartilage, low cost-effectiveness, donor site morbidity, and short-term durability. It prompts an urgent need for innovative approaches to pattern a pro-regenerative microenvironment and yield hyaline-like cartilage with similar biomechanical and biochemical properties as healthy native AC. Acellular regenerative biomaterials can create a favorable local environment for AC repair without causing relevant regulatory and scientific concerns from cell-based treatments. A deeper understanding of the mechanism of endogenous cartilage healing is furthering the (bio)design and application of these scaffolds. Currently, the utilization of regenerative biomaterials to magnify the repairing effect of joint-resident endogenous stem/progenitor cells (ESPCs) presents an evolving improvement for cartilage repair. This review starts by briefly summarizing the current understanding of endogenous AC repair and the vital roles of ESPCs and chemoattractants for cartilage regeneration. Then several intrinsic hurdles for regenerative biomaterials-based AC repair are discussed. The recent advances in novel (bio)design and application regarding regenerative biomaterials with favorable biochemical cues to provide an instructive extracellular microenvironment and to guide the ESPCs (e.g. adhesion, migration, proliferation, differentiation, matrix production, and remodeling) for cartilage repair are summarized. Finally, this review outlines the future directions of engineering the next-generation regenerative biomaterials toward ultimate clinical translation. Graphical abstract Download : Download high-res image (409KB) Download : Download full-size image

engineering, biomedical,materials science, biomaterials
The intelligent use of antibiotics in the prophylaxis and treatment of surgical infections.

F. Meleney

Abstract:
Enhanced osteochondral repair with hyaline cartilage formation using an extracellular matrix-inspired natural scaffold

Wenli Dai,Jin Cheng,Wenqiang Yan,Chenxi Cao,Fengyuan Zhao,Qi Li,Xiaoqing Hu,Jianquan Wang,Yingfang Ao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2023.07.050

IF: 18.9

2023-08-01

Science Bulletin

Abstract:Osteochondral defects pose a great challenge and a satisfactory strategy for their repair has yet to be identified. In particular, poor repair could result in the generation of fibrous cartilage and subchondral bone, causing the degeneration of osteochondral tissue and eventually leading to repair failure. Herein, taking inspiration from the chemical elements inherent in the natural extracellular matrix (ECM), we proposed a novel ECM-mimicking scaffold composed of natural polysaccharides and polypeptides for osteochondral repair. By meticulously modifying natural biopolymers to form reversible guest-host and rigid covalent networks, the scaffold not only exhibited outstanding biocompatibility, cell adaptability, and biodegradability, but also had excellent mechanical properties that can cater to the environment of osteochondral tissue. Additionally, benefiting from the drug-loading group, chondrogenic and osteogenic drugs could be precisely integrated into the specific zone of the scaffold, providing a tissue-specific microenvironment to facilitate bone and cartilage differentiation. In rabbit osteochondral defects, the ECM-inspired scaffold not only showed a strong capacity to promote hyaline cartilage formation with typical lacuna structure, sufficient mechanical strength, good elasticity, and cartilage-specific ECM deposition, but also accelerated the regeneration of quality subchondral bone with high bone mineralization density. Furthermore, the new cartilage and subchondral bone were heterogeneous, a trait that is typical of the natural landscape, reflecting the gradual progression from cartilage to subchondral bone. These results suggest the potential value of this bioinspired osteochondral scaffold for clinical applications.

multidisciplinary sciences
3D‐Printed Reinforcement Scaffolds with Targeted Biodegradation Properties for the Tissue Engineering of Articular Cartilage

Enrico Tosoratti,Philipp Fisch,Scott Taylor,Lee Ann Laurent‐Applegate,Marcy Zenobi‐Wong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202101094

IF: 10

2021-10-18

Advanced Healthcare Materials

Abstract:Achieving regeneration of articular cartilage is challenging due to the low healing capacity of the tissue. Appropriate selection of cell source, hydrogel, and scaffold materials are critical to obtain good integration and long-term stability of implants in native tissues. Specifically, biomechanical stability and in vivo integration can be improved if the rate of degradation of the scaffold material matches the stiffening of the sample by extracellular matrix secretion of the encapsulated cells. To this end, a novel 3D-printed lactide copolymer is presented as a reinforcement scaffold for an enzymatically-crosslinked hyaluronic acid hydrogel. In this system, the biodegradable properties of the reinforced scaffold are matched to the matrix deposition of articular chondrocytes embedded in the hydrogel. The lactide reinforcement provides stability to the soft hydrogel in the early stages, allowing the composite to be directly implanted in vivo with no need for a preculture period. Compared to pure cellular hydrogels, maturation and matrix secretion remain unaffected by the reinforced scaffold. Furthermore, excellent biocompatibility and production of glycosaminoglycans and collagens are observed at all timepoints. Finally, in vivo subcutaneous implantation in nude mice shows cartilage-like tissue maturation, indicating the possibility for the use of these composite materials in one-step surgical procedures.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

nanoscience & nanotechnology,engineering, biomedical,materials science, biomaterials
Preparation and Application of Decellularized ECM-Based Biological Scaffolds for Articular Cartilage Repair: A Review

Qian Zhang,Yixin Hu,Xuan Long,Lingling Hu,Yu Wu,Ji Wu,Xiaobing Shi,Runqi Xie,Yu Bi,Fangyuan Yu,Pinxue Li,Yu Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.908082

IF: 5.7

2022-06-30

Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology

Abstract:Cartilage regeneration is dependent on cellular-extracellular matrix (ECM) interactions. Natural ECM plays a role in mechanical and chemical cell signaling and promotes stem cell recruitment, differentiation and tissue regeneration in the absence of biological additives, including growth factors and peptides. To date, traditional tissue engineering methods by using natural and synthetic materials have not been able to replicate the physiological structure (biochemical composition and biomechanical properties) of natural cartilage. Techniques facilitating the repair and/or regeneration of articular cartilage pose a significant challenge for orthopedic surgeons. Whereas, little progress has been made in this field. In recent years, with advances in medicine, biochemistry and materials science, to meet the regenerative requirements of the heterogeneous and layered structure of native articular cartilage (AC) tissue, a series of tissue engineering scaffolds based on ECM materials have been developed. These scaffolds mimic the versatility of the native ECM in function, composition and dynamic properties and some of which are designed to improve cartilage regeneration. This review systematically investigates the following: the characteristics of cartilage ECM, repair mechanisms, decellularization method, source of ECM, and various ECM-based cartilage repair methods. In addition, the future development of ECM-based biomaterials is hypothesized.

multidisciplinary sciences

Die Psychosomatik des chronischen Rückenschmerzes

Biomaterial-mediated Delivery of Microenvironmental Cues for Repair and Regeneration of Articular Cartilage.

Scaffold Design and in Vitro Study of Osteochondral Coculture in a Three-Dimensional Porous Polycaprolactone Scaffold Fabricated by Fused Deposition Modeling.

Osteochondral Tissue Engineering Dilemma: Scaffolding Trends in Regenerative Medicine

3D Printing of Biomimetic Multi-Layered GelMA/nHA Scaffold for Osteochondral Defect Repair

Scaffold-Based Tissue Engineering Strategies for Osteochondral Repair

Functional biomaterials for cartilage regeneration.

Advancing Scaffold-Assisted Modality for In Situ Osteochondral Regeneration: A Shift From Biodegradable to Bioadaptable

Biomimetic Design and Fabrication of Multilayered Osteochondral Scaffolds by Low-Temperature Deposition Manufacturing and Thermal-Induced Phase-Separation Techniques

Cellular therapy and tissue engineering for cartilage repair

Applications of Biocompatible Scaffold Materials in Stem Cell-Based Cartilage Tissue Engineering

Scaffold-Dependent Mechanical and Architectural Cues Guide Osteochondral Defect Healing in silico

Engineered Osteochondral Scaffolds with Bioactive Cartilage Zone for Enhanced Articular Cartilage Regeneration

Designing Biomimetic 3D-Printed Osteochondral Scaffolds for Enhanced Load-Bearing Capacity

Osteochondral scaffolds for early treatment of cartilage defects in osteoarthritic joints: from bench to clinic.

Innovative Tissue‐Engineered Strategies for Osteochondral Defect Repair and Regeneration: Current Progress and Challenges

Engineered biochemical cues of regenerative biomaterials to enhance endogenous stem/progenitor cells (ESPCs)-mediated articular cartilage repair

The intelligent use of antibiotics in the prophylaxis and treatment of surgical infections.

Enhanced osteochondral repair with hyaline cartilage formation using an extracellular matrix-inspired natural scaffold

3D‐Printed Reinforcement Scaffolds with Targeted Biodegradation Properties for the Tissue Engineering of Articular Cartilage

Preparation and Application of Decellularized ECM-Based Biological Scaffolds for Articular Cartilage Repair: A Review