Safety and Feasibility of a Novel Exoskeleton for Locomotor Rehabilitation of Subjects With Spinal Cord Injury: A Prospective, Multi-Center, and Cross-Over Clinical Trial
Sijing Chen,Zhanbin Wang,Yongqiang Li,Jiashuai Tang,Xue Wang,Liping Huang,Zhuangwei Fang,Tao Xu,Jiang Xu,Feng Guo,Yizhao Wang,Jianjun Long,Xiaodong Wang,Fang Liu,Jianfeng Luo,Yulong Wang,Xiaolin Huang,Zishan Jia,Mei Shuai,Jianan Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2022.848443
IF: 3.493
2022-05-13
Frontiers in Neurorobotics
Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the safety, walking efficiency, physiological cost, don and doff time cost, and user satisfaction of Ai-robot. Design: Prospective, multi-center, and cross-over trial. Subjects: Paraplegic subjects ( n = 40) with T6–L2 level spinal cord injury. Methods: Subjects who could walk independently using Aiwalker, Ailegs, and hip knee ankle foot orthosis (HKAFO) for 6 min within 30 days of training underwent 10 sets of tests. In each set, they completed three 6-min walk test (6MWT) sessions using the three aids in random order. Results: Skin lesions, pressure sores, and fractures, were the main adverse events, likely due to a lack of experience in using exoskeleton systems. The average 6MWT distances of the Aiwalker, Ailegs, and HKAFO groups were 134.20 ± 18.74, 79.71 ± 18.06, and 48.31 ± 19.87 m, respectively. The average heart rate increases in the Aiwalker (4.21 ± 8.20%) and Ailegs (41.81 ± 23.47%) groups were both significantly lower than that in the HKAFO group (62.33 ± 28.32%) (both p < 0.001). The average donning/doffing time costs for Ailegs and Aiwalker were significantly shorter than that of HKAFO (both p < 0.001). Satisfaction was higher in the Ailegs and Aiwalker groups (both p < 0.001). Conclusion: Subjects with paraplegia below T6 level were able to ambulate safely and efficiently with Ai-robot. The use of Ai-robot should be learned under the guidance of experienced medical personnel.
robotics,computer science, artificial intelligence,neurosciences