Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Objective</h3><p>Due to their complex aetiology and periodicity, dark circles are difficult to characterise and measure, with current assessment techniques relying on specialist equipment, image analysis or proprietary grading scales. There is therefore a need to develop and validate a photonumeric scale for assessing infraorbital dark circles, which can provide an objective and consumer relevant tool for evaluating this condition and the efficacy of treatment products and procedures.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>A panel of expert clinical evaluators reviewed approximately three thousand facial photographs collected over a 5‐year period and selected images representing a dynamic range of dark circles. A 10‐point photonumeric scale was created, with corresponding descriptors and images for each grade of the scale. To rigorously validate the scale, linearity, sensitivity and precision were assessed by colorimetry and in‐clinic evaluation. Reproducibility was assessed photographically with both experienced and inexperienced clinical evaluators, while intra‐grader repeatability was assessed live in‐clinic. The scale was then employed in a split‐face randomised clinical trial on 58 subjects to evaluate the efficacy of a cosmetic treatment product over 8 weeks.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>Colour analysis of the images showed the scale was linear, with statistically significant correlations observed when colour data (CIElab; Individual Typology Angle) were plotted against the corresponding grades (r >0.9, p<0.001). Colour difference (Delta E) was calculated between the infraorbital zone and the surrounding skin, and when data were plotted against the grades, a statistically significant correlation was observed (r =0.99, p<0.01). The magnitude of the Delta E suggested that changes in grade are visibly perceptible to the human eye and therefore the scale is sensitive and clinically relevant. Inter‐grader reproducibility showed strong correlation (0.96) and >90% agreement between experienced evaluators, while intra‐grader repeatability assessment showed >90% perfect agreement between grades. Use of this scale in a clinical trial demonstrated the efficacy of a cosmetic product, with a mean statistically significant (p<0.001) decrease in grade of 0.74 compared to baseline, and 0.59 versus the untreated control, after 8 weeks of treatment.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusion</h3><p>Our photonumeric scale for infraorbital dark circles is sensitive and robust and provides an objective and easy‐to‐use tool to evaluate dark circles and their treatment.</p></section>

Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Evaluation of Volume Deficit of the Temple

Validation of Photonumeric Assessment Scales for Temple Volume Deficit, Infraorbital Hollows, and Chin Retrusion

Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Evaluation of Infraorbital Hollows

Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Evaluation of Volume Deficit of the Hand

Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Evaluation of Infraorbital Hollowing

Validating the Reliability and Clinical Relevance of an Infraorbital Hollow Photonumeric Scale

Measuring outcomes for temple hollowing treatment: Content validity of new and existing FACE-Q scales

Psychometric validation of the FACE-Q Aesthetics Satisfaction with Temples scale in individuals seeking minimally invasive treatment to improve temple hollowing

Validation of a four-point photographic scale for the assessment of midface volume loss and/or contour deficiency

Validation of a Midfacial Scale and Its Use in a Randomized, Evaluator-Blinded Study of CPM-HA-V

A validated photonumeric scale for infraorbital dark circles and its application in evaluating the efficacy of a cosmetic treatment product in a split‐face randomized clinical trial

A photonumeric scale for the assessment of atrophic facial photodamage

Development and Validation of a Composite Skin Quality Scale

Validated Assessment Scales for the Mid Face

Validated Assessment Scale for Neck Volume

Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Evaluation of Telangiectasia in Rosacea

A validated facial grading scale: The future of facial ageing measurement tools?

Development and validation of a global photonumeric scale for evaluating skin quality of aged female facial skin

Objective assessment of keloid scars with three-dimensional imaging: quantifying response to intralesional steroid therapy

Assessing Scar Outcomes Using Objective Scar Measurement Tools: An Adjunct to Validated Scar Evaluation Scales

Validation of a Modified National Eye Institute Grading Scale for Corneal Fluorescein Staining