Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic marker in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A pooled analysis of two randomised controlled trials

Melvin Lee Kiang Chua,Sze Huey Tan,Grace Kusumawidjaja,Ma Than Than Shwe,Shie Lee Cheah,Kam Weng Fong,Yoke Lim Soong,Joseph Tien Seng Wee,Terence Wee Kiat Tan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2016.08.006
Abstract:Purpose: To assess the prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients with International Union Against Cancer (UICC)-staged III/IVA,B nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), who were enrolled into two randomised controlled trials of concurrent/adjuvant chemotherapy when added to radiotherapy (SQNP01), and induction chemotherapy when added to chemoradiotherapy (NCC0901). Material and methods: A post hoc analysis of pooled cohorts from SQNP01 (N = 221) and NCC0901 (N = 172) was performed. We employed a threshold of pre-treatment NLR = 3.0 (median) to stratify patients. Survival outcomes were compared using log-rank test. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to assess association between NLR and overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS). Results: High NLR (≥3.0) was associated with advanced T-status (p = 0.002), N-status (p = 0.002), overall UICC stage (p = 0.004), and high pre-treatment Epstein-Barr virus DNA titre (p = 0.001). High NLR was not associated with OS (0.94 [0.67-1.32], p = 0.7), DFS (0.98 [0.73-1.33], p = 0.9), DMFS (1.02 [0.66-1.57], p = 0.9), and LRFS (1.37 [0.84-2.22], p = 0.2) on univariable and multivariable analyses, while conventional clinical indices (T-status, N-status, and overall UICC stage) were prognostic of clinical outcomes. High NLR also did not predict for a treatment effect with the experimental arms in both trials. Conclusion: Our pooled analyses that were confined to a homogenous patient population of locally advanced NPC do not suggest that NLR adds prognostic value to conventional clinical indices in identifying patients with unfavourable disease.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?