Abstract:Background: Forensic DNA testing is a powerful tool used to identify, convict, and exonerate individuals charged of criminal offenses, but there are different views on its benefits and risks. Knowledge about public views on forensic DNA testing applied in the criminal field is socially valuable to practitioners and policymakers. This paper aims to synthesize quantitative evidence about the factors that influence public views on forensic DNA testing in the criminal field. Based on a systematic search conducted in January 2019, a scoping review was performed, targeting studies presenting original empirical data that were indexed in Web of Science and PubMed. The two authors performed eligibility and data extraction. Results: The 11 studies were conducted mainly in European countries (Italy, Portugal, Serbia, Spain, Switzerland) and the remaining derived from the USA and New Zealand. Non-representative samples were mostly used to explore the benefits and risks of criminal DNA databases, criteria for insertion and retention of DNA samples and profiles, knowledge, willingness to donate a DNA sample, and custody. The value of forensic DNA databases in protecting society from crime was emphasized. Concerns about improper access to forensic genetic data and risks to civil liberties associated with its uses were expressed. The scarce literature on Forensic DNA Phenotyping and familial searching revealed the same trend of positively valuing forensic DNA testing. Only factors related with socioeconomic position were assessed by more than two studies. Results suggested that public views on forensic DNA testing are influenced by the level of education, age, and exposure to law enforcement occupations although not in a straightforward manner. Conclusion: Further empirical research should assess standardized factors related with social and structural levels (e.g., scientific literacy, public trust in the justice system and concerns about victimization or police activity) and be performed in different national jurisdictions to enable generalization and comparison of findings. It is needed to expand empirical studies on public views about the commercialization of forensic science and the use of recent controversial techniques and new transparency and accountability models.

To test or not to test? A question of rational decision making in forensic biology

Subtleties in Bayesian decision-theoretic analysis for forensic findings: Notes on recent discussion of the role of validation study data in rational decision making

Value of information analysis for interventional and counterfactual Bayesian networks in forensic medical sciences

A Bayesian approach for the analysis of error rate studies in forensic science

Psychometric analysis of forensic examiner behavior

Defence Against the Modern Arts: the Curse of Statistics "Score-based likelihood ratios"

Extending the discussion on inconsistency in forensic decisions and results

Bloodstain pattern analysis & Bayes: A case report

Analysis of the privacy-performance tradeoff of reference testing in Forensic Investigative Genetic Genealogy

What influences public views on forensic DNA testing in the criminal field? A scoping review of quantitative evidence

The Influence of Validation Data on Logical and Scientific Interpretations of Forensic Expert Opinions

Confirmative laboratory tests and one example of forensic application of the probabilistic approach to the area of convergence in BPA

A guide to measuring expert performance in forensic pattern matching

A cost–benefit analysis for use of large SNP panels and high throughput typing for forensic investigative genetic genealogy

Construction of a decision model for donor testing in cases of suspected antibody‐mediated transfusion‐related‐acute‐lung‐injury

From Pre-test and Post-test Probabilities to Medical Decision Making

Novel decision-theoretic and risk-stratification metrics of predictive performance: Application to deciding who should undergo genetic testing

Blood alcohol concentration in the clinical laboratory: a narrative review of the preanalytical phase in diagnostic and forensic testing

From understanding to justifying: Computational reliabilism for AI-based forensic evidence evaluation

Implementing statistical learning methods through Bayesian networks. Part 1: a guide to Bayesian parameter estimation using forensic science data

Feature Selection for Bayesian Evaluation of Trauma Death Risk