A Review and Bibliometric Analysis of Studies on Advances in Peripheral Nerve Regeneration
Billy McBenedict,Wilhelmina N Hauwanga,Gabriel Escudeiro,Dulci Petrus,Barakat B Onabanjo,Chukwuwike Johnny,Mohamed Omer,Amoolya R Amaravadhi,Asaju Felix,Ngoc B Dang,Lorena Adolphsson,Bruno Lima Pessôa
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.69515
2024-09-16
Cureus
Abstract:Peripheral nerve injuries (PNIs) pose significant clinical challenges due to their complex healing processes and the often incomplete functional recovery. This review and bibliometric analysis aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of advancements in peripheral nerve regeneration research, focusing on trends, influential studies, and emerging areas. By analyzing 2921 publications from the Web of Science Core Collection, key themes such as nerve regeneration, repair, and the critical role of Schwann cells were identified. The study highlights a notable increase in research output since the early 2000s, with China and the United States leading in publication volume and citations. The analysis also underscores the importance of collaborative networks, which are driving innovation in this field. Despite significant progress, the challenge of achieving complete functional recovery from PNIs persists, emphasizing the need for continued research into novel therapeutic strategies. This review synthesizes current knowledge on the mechanisms of nerve regeneration, including the roles of cellular and molecular processes, neurotrophic factors, and emerging therapeutic approaches such as gene therapy and stem cell applications. Additionally, the study revealed the use of nanotechnology, biomaterials, and advanced imaging techniques, which hold promise for improving the outcomes of nerve repair. This bibliometric analysis not only maps the landscape of peripheral nerve regeneration research but also identifies opportunities for future investigation. This study has some limitations, including reliance on the Web of Science Core Collection, which may exclude relevant research from other databases. The analysis is predominantly English-based, potentially overlooking significant non-English studies. Citation trends might be influenced by shifting research priorities and accessibility issues, affecting the visibility of older work. Additionally, geographical disparities and limited collaboration networks may restrict the global applicability and knowledge exchange in this field.