Abstract:Background: Opioid antagonists can decrease alcohol consumption in animals. Their harms and benefits have been examined in many clinical trials. Objectives: To determine the effectiveness of opioid antagonists in attenuating or preventing the recommencement of alcohol consumption in patients with alcohol dependence in comparison to placebo, other medications and psychosocial treatments. In addition, discontinuation rate, death, patient satisfaction, functioning, health-related quality of life and economic outcomes were also evaluated. Search strategy: The specialised register of the Cochrane Group on Drugs and Alcohol was searched until September 2003. The search was integrated with previous searches of Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Cochrane Library 2001, issue 4), MEDLINE (1966 - October 2001), EMBASE (1980 - December 2001) and CINHAL (1982 - December 2001). Du Pont Pharmaceutical and Ivax Corporation were contacted for information regarding unpublished trials. The reference lists of the obtained papers were also examined. Selection criteria: All relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Participants were people with alcohol dependence. Naltrexone (NTX), nalmefene (NMF) and other opioid antagonists with/without other biological or psychosocial treatments were examined. Two primary outcomes were number of participants with relapses (including those who return to heavy drinking) and number of participants who return to drinking. Other outcomes of interest were time to first drink, percentage or number of drinking days, number of standard drinks, craving, percentage or number of days or episodes of heavy drinking, amount of alcohol consumed, discontinuation rate, patient satisfaction, impaired function, health-related quality of life, economic and death. Data collection and analysis: Two reviewers evaluated and extracted the data independently. The dichotomous data were extracted on an intention-to-treat basis. The Relative Risk with the 95% confidence interval was used to assess the dichotomous data. A weighted (or standardised) mean difference (WMD or SMD) with 95% confidence interval was used to assess the continuous data. Main results: The review included 29 RCTs presented in 36 articles. Except two RCTs of nalmefene, all others investigated NTX. In comparison to placebo, a short-term treatment of NTX significantly decreased the relapse [RR (95% CI) = 0.64 (0.51 to 0.82)] and was likely to decrease the return to drinking [RR (95% CI) = 0.87 (0.76 to 1.00). In the respect of acceptability, NTX treatment significantly diminished treatment withdrawal [RR (95% CI) = 0.82 (0.70 to 0.97). While a medium-term treatment of NTX gave no benefit in the respect of relapse prevention, it was found to be beneficial on two of four secondary outcomes by increasing time to first drink and diminishing craving. A medium-term treatment of NTX was superior to acamprosate in reducing relapses, standard drinks and craving. NTX plus an intensive psychosocial treatment (PST) was not superior to NTX plus a simple PST on any primary and secondary short-term outcomes. For a medium-term treatment, NTX plus an intensive PST was superior to NTX plus a simple PST in increasing time to first drink and decreasing craving. Authors' conclusions: The review findings support that short-term treatment of NTX decreases the chance of alcohol relapses for 36% (number-needed-to-treat or NNT = 7) and likely to reduce the chance of returning to drinking for 13% (NNT = 12). In comparison to placebo group, NTX treatment can lower the risk of treatment withdrawal in alcohol-dependent patients for 28% (NNT = 13). Some major limitations of the available evidence include short study duration in many trials, small sample sizes in most trials and lack of data on psychosocial benefits. In conclusion, NTX should be accepted as a short-term treatment for alcoholism. Strategies to improve adherence to NTX treatment, eg, PSTs and management of adverse effects, should be concomitantly given. We have not yet known so far how long alcohol-dependent patients who respond to NTX treatment should continue their treatment. Due to too little evidence, NMF should have no role for the treatment of alcohol dependence.

Relapse Prevention in Alcoholism : Recent Advances and Future Possibilities

Repurposing drugs for treatment of alcohol use disorder

Central nervous system mechanisms in alcohol relapse

New pharmacotherapies for alcohol dependence

Emerging drugs in phase II and III clinical development for the treatment of alcohol use disorder

Opioid antagonists for alcohol dependence

Emerging pharmacological targets for alcohol use disorder

Involvement of the AMPA receptor GluR-C subunit in alcohol-seeking behavior and relapse

Novel medications for problematic alcohol use

Patient Perspectives on Pharmacotherapy of Alcohol Dependence

Development of an Acceptance-Based Coping Intervention for Alcohol Dependence Relapse Prevention

Substitution therapy for patients with alcohol dependence: Mechanisms of action and efficacy

Naltrexone Differentially Modulates The Neural Correlates Of Motor Impulse Control In Abstinent Alcohol-Dependent And Polysubstance-Dependent Individuals

Future pharmacological treatments for substance use disorders

Acute naltrexone does not remediate fronto-striatal disturbances in alcoholic and alcoholic polysubstance-dependent populations during a monetary incentive delay task.

[Epigenetic changes in alcohol addiction and therapeutic perspectives]

Animal Models of Drug Relapse and Craving after Voluntary Abstinence: A Review

The Endocannabinoid System and Alcohol Dependence: Will Cannabinoid Receptor 2 Agonism be More Fruitful than Cannabinoid Receptor 1 Antagonism?

Drug adjuncts for treating alcohol dependence

Efficacy and safety of alcohol reduction pharmacotherapy according to treatment duration in patients with alcohol dependence or alcohol use disorder: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis

Mechanistic insights into the efficacy of memantine in treating certain drug addictions