Abstract:Purpose: To examine whether ocular hypertension and early glaucoma cause measurable changes in spatial vision, rapid flicker sensitivity and red/green and yellow/blue colour vision. Methods: We examined subjects aged 40 to 78 years with ocular hypertension (OHT), primary open angle glaucoma (POAG), normal tension glaucoma (NTG), and age matched controls. Monocular best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was tested using EDTRS charts.VA and Functional Contrast Sensitivity (FCS) with Landolt ring stimuli of both positive and negative contrast were also measured monocularly with the Acuity‐ Plus test. Red/green (RG) and yellow/blue (YB) colour thresholds were measured with the Colour Assessment and Diagnostics (CAD) test. Photopic (cone‐enhanced) and mesopic (rod‐enhanced) rapid flicker thresholds were measured at the fovea (0°) and at an eccentricity of 5° in each of the four quadrants using the Flicker ‐Plus test. All subjects had their visual fields measured using the Humphrey visual field analyser (24–2 SITA standard protocol). Peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness (pRNFLT) and macular retinal layer thicknesses were measured using the Heidelberg Spectralis OCT. Results: The mean, logMAR BCVA for OHT patients was 0.00 and for POAG and NTG patients was −0.10 and 0.10, respectively. For control participants, mean logMAR BCVA was 0.00. Mean pRNFL thickness was significantly reduced for glaucoma patients (59.5 ± 7.7 μm) as compared to control subjects (94.6 ± 5.13 μm) and OHT patients (115.5 ± 3.5 μm). POAG and NTG patients showed significantly higher colour thresholds (mean red/green threshold 4.97, blue/yellow 5.28 CAD units) compared to control subjects (mean red/green threshold 2.07, blue/yellow 1.62 CAD units). One OHT patient showed acquired loss of blue/yellow colour vision (3.23 CAD units), with normal VA. The Acuity ‐Plus test which employs briefly presented stimuli, also revealed significant loss of VA (3.78 and 3.64 min of arc) and FCS (141.32% and 100%) in an NTG patient, with results outside normal limits for both positive and negative contrast, respectively. Central FCS was higher and outside the normal age limits for POAG patients (73.41% and 89.27%) as compared to age matched controls (61.27% and 33.63%). OHT patients, on the other hand, produced FCS thresholds within normal limits. Flicker modulation thresholds were higher for both rod and cone enhanced stimulus conditions in glaucoma and OHT patients, when compared to control subjects. Conclusion: The results reveal non‐uniform, losses that can affect selectively each of the visual attributes examined in this study. These preliminary findings suggest that in addition to VA and FCS tests, colour vision and rapid flicker sensitivity should also be examined in patients with optic nerve pathologies like glaucoma.

[Comparison of the Results of the Flicker Perimetry (Prototype versus Commercial Perimeter)]

Comparison of Perimetric Outcomes from Melbourne Rapid Fields Tablet Perimeter Software and Humphrey Field Analyzer in Glaucoma Patients

Gaze-Contingent Flicker Pupil Perimetry Detects Scotomas in Patients With Cerebral Visual Impairments or Glaucoma

Comparison of Standard Automated Perimetry, Short-Wavelength Automated Perimetry, and Frequency-Doubling Technology Perimetry to Monitor Glaucoma Progression

Comparing the detection and agreement of parapapillary atrophy progression using digital optic disk photographs and alternation flicker

Diagnostic Power and Reproducibility of Objective Perimetry in Glaucoma

New methods for detection of early loss of rapid flicker, spatial vision, and chromatic sensitivity in glaucoma

Agreement of New Automated Matched Alternation Flicker using Undilated Fundus Photography for the Detection of Glaucomatous Structural Change

A Comparison among Microperimetry, Standard Automated Perimetry and Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in the Evaluation of the Macula in Glaucoma Eyes with Hemifield Defects

Comparison of Elisar-Fast and Sita-Fast Strategy for Visual Field Assessment in Glaucoma

Evaluation of application of the SITA Faster visual field strategy in glaucoma patients

Comparitive Study of the Threshold Variability Between Blue-on-yellow Perimetry and White-on-white Perimetry

False Positive Responses in Standard Automated Perimetry

Comparison of head-mounted perimeter (imo®) and Humphrey Field Analyzer

Structurally enhanced perimetric examination

Comparison of the Automated Pattern–Noise (PANO) Glaucoma Test with the HFA, an FDT Stimulus, and the Fundus Area Cup-to-disk Ratio

Development of Visual Field Screening Procedures: A Case Study of the Octopus Perimeter

Frequency-doubling Perimetry in Examination of Open-Angle Glaucoma with Hemifield Defect

Comparison Between 24-2 ZEST and 24-2 ZEST FAST Strategies in Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension Using a Fundus Perimeter

[Comparison of Peripapillary Atrophy in Eyes with Unilateral Visual Field Defect in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Normal Tension Glaucoma].

Comparison of Snellen acuity and objective assessment using the spatial frequency sweep PVER