Predicting malaria risk considering vector control interventions under climate change scenarios

Margaux L. Sadoine,Kate Zinszer,Ying Liu,Philippe Gachon,Michel Fournier,Guillaume Dueymes,Grant Dorsey,Ana Llerena,Jane Frances Namuganga,Bouchra Nasri,Audrey Smargiassi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-52724-x

IF: 4.6

2024-01-30

Scientific Reports

Abstract:Many studies have projected malaria risks with climate change scenarios by modelling one or two environmental variables and without the consideration of malaria control interventions. We aimed to predict the risk of malaria with climate change considering the influence of rainfall, humidity, temperatures, vegetation, and vector control interventions (indoor residual spraying (IRS) and long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLIN)). We used negative binomial models based on weekly malaria data from six facility-based surveillance sites in Uganda from 2010–2018, to estimate associations between malaria, environmental variables and interventions, accounting for the non-linearity of environmental variables. Associations were applied to future climate scenarios to predict malaria distribution using an ensemble of Regional Climate Models under two Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5). Predictions including interaction effects between environmental variables and interventions were also explored. The results showed upward trends in the annual malaria cases by 25% to 30% by 2050s in the absence of intervention but there was great variability in the predictions (historical vs RCP 4.5 medians [Min–Max]: 16,785 [9,902–74,382] vs 21,289 [11,796–70,606]). The combination of IRS and LLIN, IRS alone, and LLIN alone would contribute to reducing the malaria burden by 76%, 63% and 35% respectively. Similar conclusions were drawn from the predictions of the models with and without interactions between environmental factors and interventions, suggesting that the interactions have no added value for the predictions. The results highlight the need for maintaining vector control interventions for malaria prevention and control in the context of climate change given the potential public health and economic implications of increasing malaria in Uganda.

multidisciplinary sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to predict the future malaria risk in Uganda in the context of considering climate change scenarios and malaria control interventions. Specifically, the paper predicts the distribution of malaria under different climate scenarios (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5) by modelling the impacts of environmental variables (such as rainfall, humidity, temperature, vegetation) and malaria control interventions (indoor residual spraying (IRS) and long - lasting insecticidal nets (LLIN)). The study aims to evaluate how these factors affect the future incidence of malaria, and explore the extent to which malaria risk may increase in the absence of interventions, as well as the effectiveness of different combinations of interventions in reducing malaria cases.

The paper points out that many studies have predicted the impact of climate change on malaria risk, but most of them have only considered one or two environmental variables and ignored the role of malaria control interventions. Therefore, this study particularly emphasizes the importance of considering these interventions in order to more comprehensively understand the potential risk of malaria and the effectiveness of its control strategies in the context of climate change. The research results show that in the absence of any intervention measures, by the 2050s, the annual malaria cases in Uganda may increase by 25% - 30%, and the combined use of IRS and LLIN can significantly reduce this risk, reducing malaria cases by 76%, 63% and 35% respectively. These findings emphasize the importance of continuous investment in malaria control measures, especially in the context of climate change.