A note on the morphology of the hypophysis in the gymnophione Schistomepum thomense.

H. Kuhlenbeck
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2535/OFAJ1936.46.6_307
1970-03-01
Okajimas Folia Anatomica Japonica
Abstract:Our recent communication on the morphology of the forebrain in Gymnophiona (Kuhlenbeck, M a I e w i t z and Beasley, 1966) dealt only with the significance of the topologically relevant fundamental longitudinal cell zones in telencephalon and diencephalon. Because some of our illustrations included the location of the hypophysis, we added a short reference to this structure, of which one component represents a hypothalamic neuraxial derivative. Yet, since both the subject matter of our presentation and the space available for our paper precluded any discussion of extraneous details, our reference had to remain necessarily sketchy. We merely stated that, adjacent to the parainfundibular part of the hypothalamus, the neurohypophysis with an anterior infundibular portion and a more posterior part may be recognized. The caudalward extension of the adenohypophysis to the base of the rhombencephalon was also mentioned. Moreover, those of our illustrations which adventitiously included outlines of the hypophysis (figs. 2, 5, 6, 1. c.), did not represent planes suitable for a visualization of the rather narrow caudal portion of neurohypophysis. However, seeing that relatively few data on the Caecilian hypophysis have been reported in the literature (S t end el 1, 1941 ; Laubmann, 1926; Pillay, 1957; Pasteels and Herlant, 1962 ; Wing s t r an d, 1966), it seemed therefore appropriate to add, while proceeding with further studies of the Gymnophione brain (K uhlenbec k, 1969), a few comments concerning our incidental observation on the configuration of the pituitary gland in this morphologically highly interesting vertebrate form.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?