Why US Health Care Should Think Globally

Samuel G Ruchman,Prabhjot Singh,Anna Stapleton
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.7.msoc1-1607
2016-07-01
Abstract:Why should health care systems in the United States engage with the world's poorest populations abroad while tremendous inequalities in health status and access are pervasive domestically? Traditionally, three arguments have bolstered global engagement: (1) a moral obligation to ensure opportunities to live, (2) a duty to protect against health threats, and (3) a desire to protect against economic downturns precipitated by health crises. We expand this conversation, arguing that US-based clinicians, organizational stewards, and researchers should engage with and learn from low-resource settings' systems and products that deliver high-quality, cost-effective, inclusive care in order to better respond to domestic inequities. Ultimately, connecting "local" and "global" efforts will benefit both populations and is not a sacrifice of one for the other.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?