Abstract:You have accessJournal of UrologyStone Disease: Surgical Therapy VII1 Apr 2017MP75-13 THE C.R.E.A.M. NEPHROLITHOMETRY SCORE: A COMPREHENSIVE GRADING SYSTEM BASED ON NON-ENHANCED CT SCAN TO PREDICT SUCCESS OF FLEXIBLE URETEROSCOPIC LITHOTRIPSY FOR RENAL CALCULI Ke Liu, Chunlei Xiao, Yichang Hao, and Lulin Ma Ke LiuKe Liu More articles by this author , Chunlei XiaoChunlei Xiao More articles by this author , Yichang HaoYichang Hao More articles by this author , and Lulin MaLulin Ma More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.2161AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES To propose a scoring system to standardize and grade the complexity of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (FURL) for renal calculi. The current predict methods available for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) are not validated for FURL procedures. METHODS The C.R.E.A.M. score comprises 5 reproducible variables from non-enhanced CT: (C)ount of stone number, (R)elationship between stone and parenchyma, (E)ssence of stone density, (A)rea the stone locates in, and (M)easurement of stone burden. Each of components is scored on a 3-grade scale. We first propose a novel method to standardize the stone location without considering the anatomical features of collection system. A vertical axis line through the highest point of lower lip (HPL) of renal pelvis, a horizontal line from HPL to middle parenchyma, and a 45 degree diagonal line from HPL to lower parenchyma are drawn on coronal plane of kidney. The collection system is segmented to 3 areas by the lines (diagram resembles lower case letter ′k′), which we named K-Segmentation. The C.R.E.A.M. score was validated on 112 consecutive FURL procedures performed by one single experienced surgeon in our tertiary medical center. RESULTS The mean C.R.E.A.M score was 9.6 (range 5-15). The immediate stone-free rate (SFR) was 58.0% confirmed by plain film obtained on first postoperative day. The score correlated with the operation time (P<0.001). The patients with residual stones had significant higher scores than those with stone free (10.7 vs 8.3, P<0.001). Additionally, the SFR of simple (score 5-8), medium (score 9-12), and complex (score 13-15) group were 77.6%, 54.2%, 6.7%, respectively. There was significant difference between groups (P<0.001). 20 complications (17.9%) were recorded. All were postoperative urosepsis including 3 Clavien grade one and 17 Clavien grade two. The distribution was 5 (10.2%) in simple, 10 (20.8%) in medium, and 5 (33.3%) in complex group. CONCLUSIONS The C.R.E.A.M. score can be applied to accurately predict the outcome of FURL procedure. For complex renal stones with high C.R.E.A.M scores, the SFR after FURL would be extremely low and other modalities such as PCNL should be considered. © 2017FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 197Issue 4SApril 2017Page: e1008 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2017MetricsAuthor Information Ke Liu More articles by this author Chunlei Xiao More articles by this author Yichang Hao More articles by this author Lulin Ma More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Access to diagnosis and treatment of patients with suspected sleep apnea.

Ureteral stent encrustation: evaluation of available scores as predictors of a complex surgery.

The Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy of the Preemptive Indwelling of Double-J Stents in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

A Ureteral Stricture Disease Score and Classification System: Correlation with Upper Urinary Tract Reconstructive Surgery Complexity

"Potok-1" apparatus for galvanization.

A Scoring System for Optimal Selection of Endoscopic Treatment for 1-2cm Lower Pole Renal Calculi

Differential impact of bortezomib on HL-60 and K562 cells.

Ureteral stent versus no ureteral stent for ureteroscopy in the management of renal and ureteral calculi.

Single coronary artery giving rise to an intraseptal left coronary artery in a patient presenting with neurocardiogenic syncope

Comparison of the Efficacy of Different Surgical Approaches for Complicated Impacted Proximal Ureteral Calculi Based on a New Scoring Standard: A Matched-Pair Analysis

The Role of Routine Ureteral Stenting Following Uncomplicated Ureteroscopic Treatment for Upper Ureteral and Renal Stones: A Randomized Control Trial

Evaluation of the efficacy of ureteroscopic lithotripsy for proximal impacted ureter stones based on a new scoring standard: a bicentric matched-pair analysis

Predictive factors of stone-free rate and complications in patients with proximal impacted ureteral stones undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy: based on a new scoring standard

Prediction of percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes and flexible ureteroscopy outcomes using nephrolithometry scoring systems

Novel scoring system for predicting stone-free rate after flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy

A Patient with Fragmentation of a Calcified Ureteric Stent Requiring Ureteroscopy and Laser Lithotripsy

MP44-09 A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, SINGLE-BLIND STUDY OF URETERAL STENT BIOMATERIAL ENCRUSTATION AFTER URETEROSCOPIC LITHOTROPISY

MP75-13 THE C.R.E.A.M. NEPHROLITHOMETRY SCORE: A COMPREHENSIVE GRADING SYSTEM BASED ON NON-ENHANCED CT SCAN TO PREDICT SUCCESS OF FLEXIBLE URETEROSCOPIC LITHOTRIPSY FOR RENAL CALCULI

Emergency Ureteral Stone Treatment Score Predicts Outcomes of Ureteroscopic Intervention in Acute Obstructive Uropathy Secondary to Urolithiasis

Application of S.T.O.N.E. Nephrolithometry Score for Prediction of Stone-Free Status and Complication Rates in Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Nephrolitotomy for Renal Stone

Quality of life impact and recovery after ureteroscopy and stent insertion: insights from daily surveys in STENTS