A Case with ZNF198-FGFR1 Gene Rearrangement Presenting As Acute Eosinophil Myeloid Leukemia
Hongying Chao,Min Zhou,Ri Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.147863
IF: 6.133
2015-01-01
Chinese Medical Journal
Abstract:A previously healthy 47-year-old Chinese man presented in January 2009 with extreme fatigue, fever, and night sweats. Hepatomegaly (palpable, 2 cm in the right hypochondrium) and splenomegaly (palpable, 2 cm in the left hypochondrium) were identified, and axillary lymph nodes were swollen. A laboratory investigation showed a white blood cell (WBC) count of 39.8 × 109/L with eosinophils 52% (absolute eosinophil count of 20.7 × 109/L), hemoglobin level of 14.9 g/dl and platelet count of 50.0 × 109/L. Bone marrow (BM) aspirate revealed hypercellular and occupied by approximately 22.0% blasts; eosinophils comprised 23.5% of total cellularity [Figure 1a]. Flow cytometry of these blast cells demonstrated expression of CD13, CD33, CD34, CD117, CD14, CD15, and human leukocyte antigen-DR indicating that myeloblasts were presented. Cytogenetic studies on BM showed a 46, XY, t (8;13)(p11.2;q12.1)[15]/46, idem,-7, der (14), +Mar[5] karyotype [Figure 1c]. Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed to detect gene rearrangements of BCR/ABL, FIPIL1/PDGFRA, TEL/PDGFRB were all negative as well as c-KIT and JAK2V617F mutations. Fluorescence in situ hybridization using a dual-fusion probe confirmed FGFR1 gene rearrangement [Figure 1b], the ZNF198-FGFR1 fusion test was done by RT-PCR using ZNF198-and FGFR1-specific primers (5′-TCCCTGTGCCTGTG TATATCCC-3′ and 5′-CGGGAAGCTCATACTCAGAGAC-3′, respectively) and showed a specific amplification product of 195 bp [Figure 1d]. Sequencing identified an in-frame fusion of exon 17 of ZNF198 to exon 9 of FGFR1 [Figure 1e], which was indicative of 8p11 myeloproliferative syndrome (EMS, World Health Organization [WHO] 2008, myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms with FGFR1 abnormalities[1]). Treatment was started with imatinib (400 mg once daily) plus urbason (40 mg once daily) at day 5, about 2 weeks after initiating treatment, WBC count (30.43 × 109/L) did not achieve a significant decrease and the level of hemoglobin and platelet count gradually reduced to 8.6 g/dl and 10.0 × 109/L, respectively. Therefore, imatinib and urbason therapy was stopped. Subsequently, the patient received AA (aclacinomycin plus cytarabine) regimen and had a marked initial response to the first cycle of chemotherapy: The WBC and platelet count returned to normal. However, 25 days later, the patient again developed worse, his WBC rose to 52.7 × 109/L. BM study revealed inadequate aspirate due to dry tap. At the time, a bone biopsy was performed and revealed a hypercellular with marked hypereosinophilia. High-dose cytarabine therapy was recommended and completed. Nonetheless, the patient failed to respond to aggressive chemotherapy and supportive treatment. He died in May 2009, 5 months after the initial diagnosis.Figure 1: (a) Morphologic changes of bone marrow (BM) smear (Wrighte Giemsa, 1 000) showed markedly increased abnormal myeloblasts with eosinophils. (b) Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of BM cells with an FGFR1 break-apart DNA probe revealing FGFR1 disruption and rearrangement (The distal 5′ end of FGFR1 is labeled red, the proximal 3′ end of FGFR1 is labeled green). The normal FGFR1 gene appears as juxtaposed red and green, or sometimes yellow signal. The translocation is demonstrated by separation of the red and green signals. (c) G-banded karyotype of the BM cells demonstrated the t (8;13)(p11.2;q12.1) translocation. Arrows show the chromosomes harboring the translocations. (d) Detection of the ZNF198-FGFR1 fusion transcript by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR); Lane M: The DNA of 100-bp ladder as a size marker; lane 1: Blank; lane 2: Normal cell from healthy donor; lane 3: BM mononuclear cells at initial diagnosis. (e) Nucleotide sequence analysis of the PCR product demonstrating an in-frame ZNF198-FGFR1 fusion mRNA in BM at presentation with a breakpoint at exon 17 of the ZNF198 gene and exon 9 of the FGFR1 gene.DISCUSSION The EMS is an extremely rare, aggressive hematologic malignancy involving the FGFR1 gene at chromosome 8p11 and is now classified by the WHO as myeloid and lymphoid neoplasm with FGFR1 abnormality.[1] In cases with t (8;13) (p11;q12), the FGFR1 gene at chromosome band 8p11 is fused with the ZNF198 (or ZMYM2) gene on 13q12.37.[2] The ZNF198-FGFR1 fusion protein is found in the cytoplasm and appears to foster FGFR1 dimerization and constitutively activate the FGFR1 tyrosine kinase domain, thereby promoting activation of multiple signal transduction pathways involved in oncogenesis.[234] All reported cases with ZNF198-FGFR1 in blastic phase at diagnosis showed confirmative phenotypic alterations of neoplastic cells/blasts derived from B or T cell lineage with or without CD34, and the occurrence of hypereosinophilia in blood and marrow of patients with AML was usually found in association with CBFβ-MYH11 fusion gene in AML-M4Eo with inv (16); t (16;16) or in a minority of patients with a AML1-ETO fusion gene in AML-M2 with a t (8;21).[5] However, we have reported here, the case of acute eosinophil myeloid leukemia (AML-Eo), ZNF198-FGFR1 rearrangement positive, BCR-ABL negative, presenting marked peripheral blood, and BM eosinophilia, that is extremely rare. To date, the promising approaches designed for patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia or other myeloproliferative neoplasms, has not been achieved in patients with EMS. Most of the cases, including this report, had a fatal outcome. The only potentially therapeutic intervention for this clinically aggressive disease is allogeneic-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation,[4] which indicates that the pathogenesis associated with t (8;13)(p11;q12)/ZNF198-FGFR1 is worthy of further exploration and better treatment strategies are needed.