Penicillin‐induced Skin Eruption

A. Beckerman,M. Fellner,L. Fisher
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1365-4362.1984.TB05692.X
1984-03-01
International Journal of Dermatology
Abstract:A 76-year-old white woman was admitted to the hospital on luly 14, 1982 for chronic care of senile dementia secondary to cerebral atrophy. O n September 23, the patient became febrile, with hematemesis of coffee ground material and presence of chest rales. A chest x-ray confirmed a diagnosis of pneumonia. She was treated with intravenous aqueous penicillin, 600,000 U every 6 hours for 6 days. On September 28, the intravenous penicillin was discontinued and procaine penicillin 600,000 U intramuscular was ordered, to be administered every 12 hours. On October 2, 8 days after the initial dose, the patient improved, and al l antibiotic therapy was stopped. On November 8, an isolated breakdown of the epidermal layer was noted on the patient’s left iliac crest, with further skin breakdown 1 week later of the epidermal layer on the left upper portion of the back. There was intermittent serous exudate present on the left side of the back, with appearance of healing and then further breakdown. Op-site (Smith & Nephew, Inc.), a polyurethane dressing for treatment of pressure sores, was applied to the affected areas. On December 6, the patient presented with an acute bullous eruption on the right upper back. A Tzanck smear was obtained, which revealed fluid consisting of fibrin, erthyrocytes, polymorphs, and myriads of eosinophiles. The epidermis was edematous, suggesting the wall of a bulla. A subsequent biopsy of affected tissue revealed skin with intraand subepidermal bullae, with a large number of eosinophils. Op-site dressing was discontinued, and a patch test was done to rule out sensitivity to Op-site and/or Skin-prep, an alcohol and vinyl resin swab used to increase adherence of the dressing. Results were negative for both materials. Blood tests for pemphigus and pemphigoid were also negative. Topical application of a steroid ointment twice daily was initiated. Daily observation of the patient revealed appearance of multiple new lesions for a period of 3 days following the biopsy, with sporadic and incomplete healing and heavy pigmentation of the healed tissue. Subsequently, a skin test for sensitivity to penicillin was completed. The agents used for the tests were 0.05 rnl 6 x 10-j M penicilloyl-polylysine and 0.05 m l penicillin C 10.000 U/ml. The result was a 7-ml erythematous-raised wheal sensitive to penicillin C . Additionally, Op-site dressing was reinstituted as a treatment for a grade I pressure sore on the patient’s left iliac crest. There was no reaction to the rechallenge of use of this material. An inquiry to the manufacturer of Op-site revealed the following information: ”. , , Op-site i s basically composed of a polyurethane moisture-vapor permeable membrane compounded from polyether, silica gel, acetone, and tetrahydrofuran. The membrane itself is hydrophilic and is coated with a polyvinyl ethyl ether adhesive. Our domestic files do not contain any specific reports of allergic reactions.”’
What problem does this paper attempt to address?