Survival of classic and biological systemic drugs in psoriasis: results of the BIOBADADERM registry and critical analysis

P Dávila-Seijo,E Dauden,G Carretero,C Ferrandiz,F Vanaclocha,F-J Gómez-García,E Herrera-Ceballos,P De la Cueva-Dobao,I Belinchón,J-L Sánchez-Carazo,M Alsina,J-L López-Estebaranz,M Ferrán,R Torrado,J-M Carrascosa,M Llamas,R Rivera,R Jiménez-Puya,I García-Doval,BIOBADADERM Study Group,Beatriz Pérez Zafrilla,Carlos Muñoz-Santos,Victoria Mendiola-Fernández,Cristina Sánchez Roldán,Diana Ruiz-Genao,Begoña Echeverría,Sagrario Galiano Mejías
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.13682
Abstract:Background: Few reported studies compare drug survival in moderate-to-severe psoriasis vulgaris. Objectives: To describe and compare drug survival of systemic drugs, including biologic agents (infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab and ustekinumab) and classical drugs (acitretin, ciclosporin and methotrexate) in moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Methods: This was a multicenter, prospective, cohort study of patients receiving systemic therapies between 2008 and 2013 in 12 hospitals in Spain. Baseline data and drug discontinuation were collected. Drug survival is presented using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. We compared adjusted risk ratios of serious adverse events (AEs) with results of survival analysis for AEs. Results: A total of 1956 patients were included for analysis (1240 exposed to biologics during follow-up and 1076 to classic therapies). Median follow-up time was 3.3 years (0.0-5.1 years). There were 2209 discontinuations out of 3640 therapy cycles started. The main reason for discontinuation was lack of efficacy (36.4%) and remission (27.2%). Biologics showed a higher drug survival than classics and the pattern of survival results for all outcomes (positive or negative) were very similar. Adjusted risk ratios of serious AEs did not agree with results of survival analysis. Limitations: A limitation is that this is an observational study with potential selection bias. Conclusion: Survival as a proxy measure of drug safety in psoriasis is inadequate.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?