Abstract:Importance: The US health care system is typically organized around hospitals and specialty care. The value of primary care remains unclear and debated.Objective: To determine whether an association exists between receipt of primary care and high-value services, low-value services, and patient experience.Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a nationally representative analysis of noninstitutionalized US adults 18 years or older who participated in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Propensity score-weighted quality and experience of care were compared between 49 286 US adults with and 21 133 adults without primary care from 2012 to 2014. Temporal trends were also analyzed from 2002 to 2014.Exposures: Patient-reported receipt of primary care, determined by the 4 "Cs" of primary care: first-contact care that is comprehensive, continuous, and coordinated.Main Outcomes and Measures: Thirty-nine clinical quality measures and 7 patient experience measures aggregated into 10 clinical quality composites (6 high-value and 4 low-value services), an overall patient experience rating, and 2 experience composites.Results: From 2002 to 2014, the mean annual survey response rate was 58% (range, 49%-65%). Between 2012 and 2014, compared with respondents without primary care (before adjustment), those with primary care were older (50 [95% CI, 50-51] vs 38 [95% CI, 38-39] years old), more often female (55% [95% CI, 54%-55%] vs 42% [95% CI, 41%-43%]), and predominately white individuals (50% [95% CI, 49%-52%] vs 43% [95% CI, 41%-45%]). After propensity score weighting, US adults with or without primary care had the same mean numbers of outpatient (6.7 vs 5.9; difference, 0.8 [95% CI, -0.2 to 1.8]; P = .11), emergency department (0.2 for both; difference, 0.0 [95% CI, -0.1 to 0.0]; P = .17), and inpatient (0.1 for both; difference, 0.0 [95% CI, 0.0-0.0]; P = .92) encounters annually, but those with primary care filled more prescriptions (mean, 14.1 vs 10.7; difference, 3.4 [95% CI, 2.0-4.7]; P < .001) and were more likely to have a routine preventive visit in the past year (mean, 72.2% vs 57.5%; difference, 14.7% [95% CI, 12.3%-17.1%]; P < .001). From 2012 to 2014, Americans with primary care received more high-value care in 4 of 5 composites. For example, 78% of those with primary care received high-value cancer screening compared with 67% without primary care (difference, 10.8% [95% CI, 8.5%-13.0%]; P < .001). Americans with or without primary care received low-value care with similar frequencies on 3 of 4 composites, although Americans with primary care received more low-value antibiotics (59% vs 48%; difference, 11.0% [95% CI, 2.8%-19.3%] P < .001). Respondents with primary care also reported significantly better health care access and experience. For example, physician communication was highly rated for a greater proportion of those with (64%) vs without (54%) primary care (difference, 10.2%; 95% CI, 7.2%-13.1%; P < .001). Differences in quality and experience between Americans with or without primary care were essentially stable between 2002 and 2014.Conclusions and Relevance: Receipt of primary care was associated with significantly more high-value care, slightly more low-value care, and better health care experience. Policymakers and health system leaders seeking to improve value should consider increasing investments in primary care.

Comparing Use of Low-Value Health Care Services Among U.S. Advanced Practice Clinicians and Physicians

Quality and Experience of Outpatient Care in the United States for Adults With or Without Primary Care

Comparison of Low-Value Care Among Commercial and Medicaid Enrollees

Quality of primary care by advanced practice nurses: a systematic review

Nurse practitioner low-value care ordering practices: an integrative review

The quality of home‐based primary care delivered by nurse practitioners: A national Medicare claims analysis

Nurse practitioners' and physicians' care activities and clinical outcomes with an inpatient geriatric population

Primary Care Physicians In Medicare Advantage Were Less Costly, Provided Similar Quality Versus Regional Average

Discrepancies Among Hospitals and Regions in the Provision of Low-Value Care

Association between primary care appointment lengths and subsequent ambulatory reassessment, emergency department care, and hospitalization: a cohort study

Comparison of industry payments to psychiatrists and psychiatric advanced practice clinicians in the USA, 2021: a cross-sectional study

Comparison of prior authorization across insurers: cross sectional evidence from Medicare Advantage

Racial differences in low value care among older adult Medicare patients in US health systems: retrospective cohort study

Comparing the Quality of Primary Care Between Public and Private Providers in Urban China: A Standardized Patient Study.

A Systematic Review of Outcomes Related to Nurse Practitioner-Delivered Primary Care for Multiple Chronic Conditions

Role of Patient Sorting in Avoidable Hospital Stays in Medicare Advantage vs Traditional Medicare

Resource Utilization in Non-Academic Emergency Departments with Advanced Practice Providers

The Effect of a Multidisciplinary Hospitalist/Physician and Advanced Practice Nurse Collaboration on Hospital Costs

Assessment of Physician Priorities in Delivery of Preventive Care

Assessment of Overuse of Medical Tests and Treatments at US Hospitals Using Medicare Claims

Exploring Attributes of High-Value Primary Care