The association of disability conditions with access to minimally invasive general surgery

Wardah Rafaqat,May Abiad,Emanuele Lagazzi,Dias Argandykov,Jefferson A. Proaño-Zamudio,Elaine P.X. Van Ee,George C. Velmahos,John O. Hwabejire,Haytham M.A. Kaafarani,Michael P. DeWane
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2024.101586
IF: 4.615
2024-01-25
Disability and Health Journal
Abstract:Background Despite the high prevalence of disability conditions in the US, their association with access to minimally invasive surgery (MIS) remains under-characterized. Objective To understand the association of disability conditions with rates of MIS and describe nationwide temporal trends in MIS in patients with disability conditions. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Nationwide Readmission Database (2016–2019). We included patients ≥18 years undergoing general surgery procedures. Our primary outcome was the impact of disability conditions on the rate of MIS. We performed 1:1 propensity matching, comparing patients with disability conditions with those without and adjusting for patient, procedure, and hospital characteristics. We performed a subgroup analysis among patients<65 years and with patients with each type of disability. We evaluated temporal trends of MIS in patients with disabilities. We identified predictors of undergoing MIS using mixed effects regression analysis. Results In the propensity-matched comparison, a lower proportion of patients with disabilities had MIS. In the sub-group analyses, the rate of MIS was significantly lower in patients below 65 years with disabilities and among patients with motor and intellectual impairments. There was an increasing trend in the proportion of patients with disabilities undergoing MIS (p < 0.005). The regression analysis confirmed that the presence of a disability was associated with decreased odds of undergoing MIS. Conclusions This study characterizes the negative association of disability conditions with access to MIS. As the healthcare landscape evolves, considerations on how to equitably share new treatment modalities with a wide range of patient populations are necessary.
public, environmental & occupational health,health care sciences & services,rehabilitation,health policy & services
What problem does this paper attempt to address?