A new index based on serum creatinine and cystatin C is useful for assessing sarcopenia in patients with advanced cancer

Xiaofen Fu,Zhen Tian,Su Wen,Huihui Sun,Sudip Thapa,Huihua Xiong,Huiquan Liu,Lu Li,Shiying Yu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2020.111032
IF: 4.893
2021-02-01
Nutrition
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Purpose</h3><p>Sarcopenia is a well-known risk factor for inferior cancer outcomes, but the identification of patients at risk remains challenging. A new sarcopenia index (SI), defined as serum creatinine (Cr) × cystatin C (CysC)-based glomerular filtration rate (eGFR<sub>CysC</sub>), has been reported to be an objective surrogate marker for sarcopenia. We aimed to assess whether the SI is associated with sarcopenia and cancer-related fatigue (CRF) in advanced cancer patients.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Methods</h3><p>A total of 182 patients with different types of cancer (cancer stages III/IV; mean age 55.1 ± 11.1 years) were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Sarcopenia was defined as the presence of both low muscle mass and low muscle strength. The cross-sectional area of skeletal muscle mass (SMA) at the third lumbar spine was estimated by computed tomography (CT). Low muscle mass was defined as a skeletal muscle index (SMA/height2) less than 34.9 cm2/m2 for females and 40.8 cm2/m2 for males. Low muscle strength was determined by handgrip strength (HGS) according to the cutoffs of the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (&lt; 18 kg for women and &lt; 26 kg for men). CRF was measured by the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI). The associations between SI with both sarcopenia and CRF were investigated.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>The prevalence of sarcopenia was 27.5%. The SI was significantly lower in both the sarcopenia and severe fatigue groups. The associations between SI and SMA (<em>r</em> = 0.365; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), skeletal muscle index (SMI) (<em>r</em> = 0.340; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and HGS (<em>r</em> = 0.414; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) were stronger than the associations between the serum creatinine/ cystatin C (Cr/CysC) ratio and SMA (<em>r</em> = 0.299; <em>P</em> &lt;0.001), SMI (<em>r</em> = 0.269; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and HGS (<em>r</em> = 0.364; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). In addition, a decrease in the SI was associated with a higher likelihood of sarcopenia [odds ratio per 10-unit, 1.09; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02–1.16] after adjusting for potential confounding factors. However, there was only a weak correlation between the SI and BFI score (<em>r</em> = -0.161, <em>P</em> = 0.045).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusion</h3><p>The SI might be a useful objective tool for assessing sarcopenia in advanced cancer patients. Further studies are warranted to extend our findings.</p>
nutrition & dietetics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?