Histamine release from the perfused lung of the guinea pig by serotoxin, anaphylatoxin.

M. Rocha e Silva,M. Aronson
1952-12-01
Abstract:THERE are two theories of the mechanism of anaphylaxis, one cellular and the other humoral. The first was formulated by Dale (1913, 1920, 1929), and held that the cells were the site of liberation of the anaphylactic poison (histamine). The humoral theory, developed by Friedberger (1909, 1911), Bordet (1913), Keysser and Wassermann (1911) and Nathan (1913) pointed to the blood as the source of a toxic principle, the anaphylatoxin, which was generated by contact with a specific precipitate or substances such as kaolin, barium sulphate, agar, starch, or inulin. Since anaphylatoxin prepared by treating serum with agar did not contain enough histamine to kill a guinea-pig, and did not regularly produce a stimulating effect on the isolated uterus, Dale and Kellaway (1922) decided that it could not be a true anaphylactic poison. Recently the histamine theory has been preferred to the anaphylatoxin theory because of the experiments of Bartosch, Feldberg and Nagel (1932), Daly, Peat and Schild (1935), Ungar and Parrot (1936) and Schild (1939) in which it was conclusively shown that direct contact of the antigen with washed guinea-pig lungs and several other tissues was enough to result in the release of histamine. However, the amounts of histamine that can be liberated by perfusion of the guinea-pig lung with Tyrode solution containing antigen have always been very small, 04-4*0 ,ug. in the experiments of Bartosch et al. (1932) and 0*5-12*0 ,sg. in those of Daly et at. (1935). Recently Hahn and Oberdorf (1950) showed that antihistaminics prevented the shock produced in the guinea-pig by anaphylatoxin which had been prepared by incubation of normal guinea-pig serum with inulin. This led us to studv the mechanism by which anaphylatoxin produces its effects. We want to suggest that it is a powerful histamine-releasing agent and hope thus to combine the cellular and the humoral theories of anaphylaxis. Since the final mediator of the shock (histamine) comes from the tissues and the intermediate releasing agent (anaphylatoxin) is a blood-borne principle, a general theory of anaphylaxis might embody both views as parts of the same phenomenon (Rocha e Silva, Aronson and Bier, 1951; Rocha e Silva, 1952).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?