Anesthesia Services Increase Risk of Complications after Colonoscopy: We Are Not Sure!
Wan‐Jie Gu,Xiaoping Gu,Zhengliang Ma
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2016.04.053
IF: 29.4
2016-01-01
Gastroenterology
Abstract:Colonoscopy is one of the most common screening tests for colorectal cancer worldwide.1Winawer S.J. et al.Gastroenterology. 1997; 112: 594-642Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1829) Google Scholar Despite the advance in perioperative care, colonoscopy screening still exposes patients to risk of complications and even harms. Anesthesiologists play an increasingly vital role in perioperative care for patients undergoing colonoscopy, and anesthesia services can improve patient safety and decrease unnecessary complications in some conditions, particularly for high-risk patients. Accordingly, the use of anesthesia services during gastroenterology procedures, especially colonoscopy, has increased substantially.2Liu H. et al.JAMA. 2012; 307: 1178-1184Crossref PubMed Scopus (144) Google Scholar Recently, there has been growing debate about whether anesthesia services are associated with patient outcomes during colonoscopy. Wernli et al3Wernli K.J. et al.Gastroenterology. 2016; 150: 888-894Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (134) Google Scholar compared the risk of complications after colonoscopy with versus without anesthesia services and concluded that the overall risk of complications after colonoscopy increases when individuals receive anesthesia services. The authors should be commended for their important and excellent work. Strengths of this study include a large sample of patients with a prospective cohort design and using a multivariable logistic model to control for potential confounders. Furthermore, the authors acknowledged the limitations of their work. However, in our view, the findings should be interpreted with caution. First, the difference in risk of complications may partly result from uncontrolled confounding. In the study, many preoperative and intraoperative risk factors that may affect patient outcomes were not included in the multivariable logistic model, such as the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, smoking status, body mass index, functional status, preoperative coexisting comorbidities and medications used, and intraoperative hemodynamic instability. Thus, all these important known factors should be taken into account in the multivariable logistic model. Moreover, other factors including endoscopist volume and facility type may also contribute to the increased risk of complications, although the evidence is preliminary. Chukmaitov et al4Chukmaitov A. et al.Gastrointest Endosc. 2013; 77: 436-446Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (66) Google Scholar demonstrated that low-volume endoscopists and ambulatory surgery centers were associated with higher risks of adverse events. Next, the present study enrolled only special patients aged 40–64 years who had undergone an outpatient colonoscopy. In fact, most of these patients are at low risk of complications, because they often have a low ASA classification (I/II) and comorbidities score (≤1). Previous evidence suggested that advanced age (≥65 years), high ASA classification (III/IV/V), and high comorbidities score (≥2) are predictive risk factors of complications.5Cooper G.S. et al.JAMA Intern Med. 2013; 173: 551-556Crossref PubMed Scopus (187) Google Scholar, 6Vargo J.J. et al.Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Feb 18; Google Scholar Thus, there may be a limited ability to generalize the findings of this study, to some extent, to other populations, particularly high-risk patients with advanced age. Last, some evidence tends to support the notion that anesthesia services are not associated with risk of complications among patients undergoing colonoscopy. Dominitz et al7Dominitz J.A. et al.Gastroenterology. 2013; 144: 298-306Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (40) Google Scholar demonstrated that anesthesia services were not associated with the risk of complications in multivariate analyses. In addition, a propensity-matched cohort study showed no difference in outcomes associated with the presence or absence of anesthesia services during colonoscopy in terms of myocardial infarction, stroke, or hospital admission within 7 days.8Lubarsky D.A. et al.J Multidiscip Healthc. 2015; 8: 255-270PubMed Google Scholar More recently, Vargo et al6Vargo J.J. et al.Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Feb 18; Google Scholar suggested that there was no difference in the risk of complications after colonoscopy between patients receiving anesthesia versus endoscopist-directed sedation. In summary, based on the current conflicting evidence, we are not sure whether anesthesia services increase the risk of complications after colonoscopy. Further research is warranted to define the risk of complications associated with anesthesia services during colonoscopy before we adopt the findings to clinical practice. Risks Associated With Anesthesia Services During ColonoscopyGastroenterologyVol. 150Issue 4PreviewWe aimed to quantify the difference in complications from colonoscopy with vs without anesthesia services. Full-Text PDF ReplyGastroenterologyVol. 151Issue 3PreviewWe thank the authors who have responded to our recent work on the relationship between anesthesia services and short-term colonoscopy outcomes,1 and welcome the opportunity to respond to their questions concerning our methods and interpretation. Full-Text PDF