Relations of Well-Being, Coping Styles, Perception of Self-Influence on the Diabetes Course and Sociodemographic Characteristics with HbA1c and BMI Among People with Advanced Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Agnieszka Łukasiewicz,Andrzej Kiejna,Ewelina Cichoń,Aleksandra Jodko-Modlińska,Marcin Obrębski,Andrzej Kokoszka
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S320909
2022-02-11
Abstract:Agnieszka &Lstrokukasiewicz, 1 Andrzej Kiejna, 2, 3 Ewelina Cicho&nacute, 2, 3 Aleksandra Jodko-Modli&nacuteska, 4 Marcin Obr&eogonbski, 4 Andrzej Kokoszka 4 1 Faculty of Nursing in Warsaw, University of Humanities and Economics in Lodz, Warsaw, Poland; 2 Department of Psychology, WSB University in Torun, Torun, Wroclaw, Poland; 3 Department of Psychology, Faculty of Applied Studies, University of Lower Silesia, Wroclaw, Poland; 4 II Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland Correspondence: Andrzej Kokoszka Tel/Fax +48 22 326 58 92 Email Purpose: Assessment of the relationship between psychological and sociodemographic factors with the levels of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and Body Mass Index (BMI) among people with advanced type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Patients and Methods: A total of 2574 persons, among them 1381 (53.7%) women, with type 2 diabetes, during the period of switching from biphasic mixtures of human insulin to insulin analogues. The age of participants ranged from 22 to 94 years (M = 63.5; SD = 9.58), and their treatment period was in the time frame from 2 years to 43 years (M = 10.2; SD = 6.1). Participants filled out a Scale for Perception of Self-Influence on the Diabetes Course, Well-Being Index WHO-5, two questions from the Brief Method of Evaluating Coping with a Disease. Results: Statistically significant correlations were found between the HbA1c levels and (1) disease duration (r s =0.067; p < 0.001); (2) number of complications (r s = 0.191, p < 0.001) (3) the perception of self-influence on the diabetes course (r s =- 0.16; p < 0.001); (4) well-being (risk of depression) (r s =- 0.10; p < 0.001). The regression analysis showed that 7% of HbA1c variability is explained by age, a perception of self-influence on the diabetes course, the number of complications, place of residence, education, BMI. The most important findings concerning BMI were found in regression analysis, which indicated a week relationship between BMI and a number of complications, perception of self-influence on the diabetes course and coping styles (3% of the resultes' variability). The group at high risk of depression had the highest levels of HbA1c. Conclusion: Sociodemographic and psychological factors show weak but statistically significant relationships with the current levels of HbA1c and BMI. Keywords: type 2 diabetes mellitus, glycemic control, psychosocial factors, HbA1C, BMI, depression Optimal management of type 2 diabetes is a challenge for modern medicine as the consequences of pathological blood glucose levels often lead to serious complications and premature death. Improper adherence to medical recommendations for disease management is also common among patients with this disease. To improve this situation, research into the psychosocial aspects of diabetes is ongoing and its results lead to conclusions that are contained in treatment guidelines. 1,2 The bidirectional relationship between depression and type 2 diabetes is best documented. The results of a recent meta-analysis of longitudinal studies indicate that the baseline level of depression is much more associated with the risk of increased levels of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) than vice versa. 3 The results for other psychological and social factors are not as well documented. Two large international studies Diabetes, Attitudes, Wishes and Needs (DAWN) 4 and the Second DAWN study/DAWN2 5 did not take into consideration a level of HbA1c, that reflects the average blood glucose concentration at approximately 3 months before the test, with the majority (about 60%) of HbA1c being formed in the last month before the test. Achieving and maintaining normal levels of glucose remains a challenge for many persons with diabetes. Only 25.5% of patients had adequate glycemic control in a study conducted in 7 European countries. 6 Surveys from other countries reported that 60.5% to 78.2% of patients had poor glycemic control. 7–9 Meta-analysis of 23 studies reported the average HbA1c of 8.4%. 10 A systematic review and meta-analysis show limited associations between HbA1c and mental state. 11 Psychosocial interventions improved HbA1c to a small but significant extent (unified mean difference of 20.29%) and had some effect on mental status. Meta-analysis indicated that psychological interventions for adults with T2DM have minimal clinical benefits in improving glycemic control. 12 Data obtained from 23 studies on 3818 patients indicates that psychoeducational int -Abstract Truncated-