Long-Term Resistance Trained Human Muscles Have More Fibres, More Myofibrils and Tighter Myofilament Packing than Untrained

Sumiaki Maeo,Thomas G. Balshaw,Benjamin März,Zhaoxia Zhou,Bill Haug,Neil R. W. Martin,Nicola Maffulli,Jonathan P. Folland
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000003495
2024-06-19
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Abstract:ABSTRACT Introduction Increases in skeletal muscle size occur in response to prolonged exposure to resistance training that is typically ascribed to increased muscle fibre size. Whether muscle fibre number also changes remains controversial, and a paucity of data exists about myofibrillar structure. This cross-sectional study compared muscle fibre and myofibril characteristics in long-term resistance-trained (LRT) versus untrained (UNT) individuals. Methods The maximal anatomical cross-sectional area (ACSAmax) of the biceps brachii muscle was measured by MRI in 16 LRT (5.9 ± 3.5 years’ experience) and 13 UNT males. A muscle biopsy was taken from the biceps brachii to measure muscle fibre area, myofibril area and myosin spacing. Muscle fibre number, myofibril number in total and per fibre were estimated by dividing ACSAmax by muscle fibre area or myofibril area, and muscle fibre area by myofibril area, respectively. Results Compared to UNT, LRT individuals had greater ACSAmax (+70%, P < 0.001), fibre area (+29%, P = 0.028), fibre number (+34%, P = 0.013), and myofibril number per fibre (+49%, P = 0.034) and in total (+105%, P < 0.001). LRT individuals also had smaller myosin spacing (-7%, P = 0.004; i.e. greater packing density) and a tendency towards smaller myofibril area (-16%, P = 0.074). ACSAmax was positively correlated with fibre area ( r = 0.526), fibre number ( r = 0.445) and myofibril number (in total r = 0.873 and per fibre r = 0.566), and negatively correlated with myofibril area ( r = -0.456) and myosin spacing ( r = -0.382) (all P < 0.05). Conclusions The larger muscles of LRT individuals exhibited more fibres in cross-section and larger muscle fibres, which contained substantially more total myofibrils and more packed myofilaments than UNT participants, suggesting plasticity of muscle ultrastructure.
sport sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?