A phase I dose escalation study of the LRP5 antagonist BI 905681 in patients with advanced and metastatic solid tumors

D.R. Spigel,J.S. Wang,L. Pronk,B. Muskens,M. Teufel,B. Bashir,H. Burris
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103730
IF: 6.883
2024-12-02
ESMO Open
Abstract:Highlights • BI 905681 is an LRP5 antagonist that has demonstrated preclinical antitumor activity. • This first-in-human phase I dose escalation study evaluates BI 905681 monotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors. • Two patients experienced a DLT during the entire treatment period (C-telopeptide increase). • The MTD could not be determined. • BI 905681 had minimal efficacy in an unselected patient population. Background The Wnt pathway is involved in proliferation and tissue homeostasis. Aberrant activation promotes cancer cell proliferation and survival. Inhibition of the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5/6 (LRP5/6) coreceptors that regulate Wnt signaling could prevent cancer cell proliferation. BI 905681 is a novel LRP5 antagonist that has demonstrated potent in vivo antitumor activity. Patients and methods This was a phase I, dose escalation study (NCT04147247) evaluating BI 905681 in patients with advanced solid tumors over two dosing schedules (schedule A: every 3 weeks, 3-week cycles and schedule B: every 2 weeks, 4-week cycles). The primary endpoint was the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of BI 905681 and the number of patients experiencing adverse events (AEs). Other endpoints were pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy. Results As a result of difficulties enrolling patients, the trial was terminated early and the MTD for schedule A could not be determined. Twenty-one patients received BI 905681 over five dose cohorts (schedule A: 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 7.0, and 8.5 mg/kg). No patients received schedule B. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were reported during the MTD evaluation period. However, during the entire treatment period, two patients (9.5%) experienced a DLT of grade 1 C-telopeptide increase in the 5.0 and 8.5 mg/kg dose cohorts. The most frequent treatment-related AEs were diarrhea (23.8%), vomiting (23.8%), nausea (19.0%), and infusion-related reactions (IRRs; 14.3%). Despite premedication to mitigate IRRs, one patient experienced a grade 2 IRR. The pharmacokinetic profiles of BI 905681 were biphasic, with a rapid distribution phase in the beginning followed by a slower elimination phase. The objective response rate was 0%; 5 (23.8%) and 14 patients (66.7%) had a best overall response of stable disease and progressive disease, respectively. Conclusion BI 905681 has minimal efficacy in an unselected patient population and was generally well tolerated.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?