Abstract:Background Optimal selection of vascular access devices is based on multiple factors and is the first strategy to reduce vascular access device‐related complications. This process is dependent on behavioural and human factors. The COM‐B (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behaviour) model was used as a theoretical framework to organize the findings of this systematic review. Methods/Aims To synthesize the evidence on determinants shaping the optimal selection of vascular access devices, using the COM‐B behavioural model as the theoretical framework. Design Systematic review of studies which explore decision‐making at the time of selecting vascular access devices. Data Sources The Medline, Web of Science, Scopus and EbscoHost databases were interrogated to extract manuscripts published up to 31 December 2021, in English or Spanish. Results Among 16 studies included in the review, 8/16 (50%) focused on physical capability, 8/16 (50%) psychological capability, 15/16 (94%) physical opportunity, 12/16 (75%) social opportunity, 1/16 (6%) reflective motivation and 0/16 (0%) automatic motivation. This distribution represents a large gap in terms of interpersonal and motivational influences and cultural and social environments. Specialist teams (teams created for the insertion or maintenance of vascular access devices) are core for the optimal selection of vascular access devices (75% physical capability, 62% psychological capability, 80% physical opportunity and 100% social opportunity). Conclusion Specialist teams predominantly lead all actions undertaken towards the optimal selection of vascular access devices. These actions primarily centre on assessing opportunity and capability, often overlooking motivational influences and social environments. Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care A more implementation‐focused professional approach could decrease inequity among patients and complications associated with vascular access devices. Impact Optimal selection of vascular access devices is the primary strategy in mitigating complications associated with these devices. There is a significant disparity between interpersonal and motivational influences and the cultural and social environments. Furthermore, specialized teams play a pivotal role in facilitating the optimal selection of vascular access devices. The study can benefit institutions concerned about vascular access devices and their complications. Reporting Method This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Patient or public contribution No Patient or Public Contribution. What does this article contribute to the wider global clinical community? Optimal selection of vascular devices remains a growing yet unresolved issue with costly clinical and patient experience impact. Interventions to improve the optimal selection of vascular devices have focused on training, education, algorithms and implementation of specialist vascular teams; alas, these approaches do not seem to have substantially addressed the problem. Specialist vascular teams should evolve and pivot towards leading the implementation of quality improvement interventions, optimizing resource use and enhancing their role.

Factors affecting the ability of patients with complex vascular anomalies to navigate the healthcare system

Factors affecting pathways to care for children and adolescents with complex vascular malformations: parental perspectives

Challenges in Management of the Adult Vascular Anomalies Population: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

The Role of Medical Management in Vascular Anomalies

Pearls and Pitfalls in the Management of Vascular Anomalies

Dyadic coping experiences of parents of children with vascular anomalies

Complex management of concurrent lower extremity arteriovenous malformations: A case study and review of interventional techniques

Uncommon arteriopathies: what the vascular surgeon needs to know

New Insights into Cervicofacial Vascular Anomalies

Imaging of Vascular Anomalies

What the Interventional Radiologist Needs to Know about the Genetics of Vascular Anomalies

Management of Vertebral Defects, Anal Atresia, Cardiac Defects, Tracheoesophageal Fistula or Atresia, Renal Anomalies, and Limb Abnormalities (VACTERL) in a Child With Complex Medical Needs in the Foster Care System: A Pediatric Case Study

Congenital Vascular and Lymphatic Diseases

Infantile Hemangiomas and Vascular Anomalies

Soft Tissue Vascular Anomalies of the Extremities: A Proposed Diagnostic Approach

Transportation Barriers in Pediatric Orthopaedic Clinic Visits

Innovative Approaches and Future Directions in the Management and Understanding of Varicose Veins: A Systematic Review

Vascular access: anatomy, examination, management

Determinants of the optimal selection of vascular access devices: A systematic review underpinned by the COM‐B behavioural model

Vascular Anomalies (Part II): Interventional Therapy of Peripheral Vascular Malformations

Unusual Developmental Vascular Anomalies: Insights From a Chest Physician's Perspective