Lightweight fruit detection algorithms for low‐power computing devices
Olarewaju Mubashiru Lawal,Huamin Zhao,Shengyan Zhu,Liu Chuanli,Kui Cheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1049/ipr2.13098
IF: 2.3
2024-06-05
IET Image Processing
Abstract:This paper would be of great interest to the readers of this journal. A lightweight fruit detection algorithm is important to ensure real‐time detection on low‐power computing devices while maintaining detection accuracy. In addition, the fruit detection algorithm is also faced with some environmental factors. To solve these challenges, lightweight detection algorithms termed YOLO‐Lite, YOLO‐Liter and YOLO‐Litest were developed based on the YOLOv5 framework. The compared mean average precision (mAP) detection revealed that YOLO‐Lite at 0.86 is 2%, 4%, 5%, 7%, and 16% more than YOLO‐Liter and YOLOv5n at 0.84 each, YOLOv4‐tiny at 0.82, YOLO‐Liter at 0.81, YOLO‐MobileNet at 0.79, and YOLO‐ShuffleNet at 0.70, respectively, but not for YOLOv8n at 0.87. On the Computer platform, except for YOLOv4‐tiny at 178.6 frames per second (FPS), the speed of YOLO‐Litest at 158.7 FPS is faster than YOLO‐Liter at 129.9 FPS, YOLO‐Lite at 120.5 FPS, YOLO‐ShuffleNet at 119.0 FPS, YOLOv8n at 116 FPS, YOLOv5n at 111.1 FPS, and YOLO‐MobileNet at 89.3 FPS. Using Jetson Nano, the 32.3 FPS of YOLO‐Litest is faster than other algorithms, but not YOLOv4‐tiny's 34.1 FPS. On the Raspberry Pi 4B, YOLO‐Litest with 4.69 FPS, outperformed other algorithms. The choices for an accurate and faster detection algorithm are YOLO‐Lite and YOLO‐Litest respectively, while YOLO‐Liter maintains a balance between them.
computer science, artificial intelligence,engineering, electrical & electronic,imaging science & photographic technology