County health ranking: untangling social determinants of health and other factors associated with short-term metabolic surgery outcomes.

Spencer Trooboff,Abigail Pohl,Aaron C. Spaulding,Launia J. White,Michael A. Edwards
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2024.03.015
IF: 3.709
2024-03-27
Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
Abstract:Background The complex interplay of social determinants of health (SDoH), race/ethnicity, and traditional surgical risk factors on outcomes following metabolic surgery is poorly understood. Objectives To evaluate the relationship between SDoH as measured by county health ranking (CHR) and short-term metabolic surgery outcomes. Setting Five Accredited Bariatric Program Sites at a national academic health system. Methods Data were collected from five sites of a single health system spanning 2010-2021. Current procedural terminology codes identified primary and revisional cases. Patient characteristics, procedural data, and 30-day occurrences were collected. County Health Rankings (CHR) for health factors were determined by zip code and stratified into best, middle, and worst terciles. The primary outcome was 30-day complications, readmissions, or reintervention/reoperation. Logistic regression assessed the correlation between CHR tercile and morbidity. Results We analyzed 4,315 primary and 370 revisional metabolic surgery cases. Overall, 64.0%, 27.4%, and 8.6% lived in the best, middle, and worst CHR terciles, respectively. Patients in the middle and worst CHR terciles were more commonly older, non-Hispanic black or Hispanic, with pre-existing COPD, hypertension, dialysis-dependence, were on therapeutic anticoagulation, or had IVC filters. Middle and worst CHR tercile patients were more likely to undergo index sleeve gastrectomy, robotic-assisted surgery, and have surgery performed by a self-designated General Surgeon. 30-day outcomes were similar across CHR terciles. Racial disparity in multiple short-term outcomes persisted despite adjustment for CHR tercile. Conclusion Higher-risk patients are more likely to be from counties with lower CHR; however, CHR was not independently associated with 30-day outcomes after metabolic surgery.
surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?