Can confrontation or avoidance coping reduce incivility recurrence? The roles of organizational communication openness and targets' status at work

Yu Yan,Kai-Chen Zhao,Li-Jiao Jiang,Shuai-Ping Xiao,Iqbal Mujahid,Zhao-Xue Cao,Yi Lu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06931-4
IF: 2.8
2024-11-30
Current Psychology
Abstract:Incivility harms both employees and organizations but is often overlooked due to its low intensity and ambiguous intent. Unfortunately, existing studies on incivility coping have not yet identified effective strategies, such as avoidance or confrontation, to reduce its recurrence. Building upon the coping process of the transactional model of stress, this research proposes that organizational communication openness and targets' status at work significantly affect the effectiveness of coping strategies. To test our hypotheses, we conducted a three-wave study with a sample of 219 employees in China from diverse occupations. The results indicated that avoidance, rather than confrontation, mediated the relationship between incivility and its recurrence. Furthermore, this indirect effect could be moderated by both organizational communication openness and targets' status at work. Supplementary analysis also showed that these factors could moderate the conditional influence of confrontation on the relationship between incivility and its recurrence. In summary, this study concludes that targets often resort to avoidance when facing incivility, which inadvertently leads to its recurrence, particularly within organizations characterized by high communication openness or when both parties in the incivility interaction share the same organizational status. In contrast, confrontation can sometimes appear as a more constructive approach to preventing the recurrence of incivility, especially within organizations with high communication openness or when the instigator occupies a high-level position.
psychology, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?