A Systematic Review of Controlled Clinical Trials

Mojgan Amiri,Renald Meçani,Erand Llanaj,Christa D. Niehot,Terri L. Phillips,Katherine Goldie,Janina Kolb,Taulant Muka,Hua Daughtry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13061686
IF: 3.9
2024-03-15
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Abstract:Background: This study aimed to systematically review and summarize the available controlled clinical trials on the effectiveness of calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA) in terms of aesthetic outcomes, skin-aging-related outcomes, and patient/investigator satisfaction. Methods: We included controlled clinical trials involving at least 10 human adults that examined the effects of CaHA on aesthetic and skin-aging-related outcomes and satisfaction. Due to the high heterogeneity among the included studies, only a qualitative analysis is provided. Results: Out of 2935 relevant references, 13 studies were included, of which 8 studies focused on facial areas and 5 on dorsum of hand. CaHA injection was associated with enhancements in global aesthetic improvement scale, whether applied in facial regions or on the dorsum of hands. The findings suggested high patients' satisfaction following CaHA when applied to facial areas. Studies highlighted improvements in hand grading scales and a reduction in facial wrinkles. Conclusions: Current evidence suggests that CaHA injections improve aesthetic results, including facial areas, such as nasolabial folds and jawline, and hands, with high levels of satisfaction. Considering the methodological limitations and heterogeneous comparisons groups, additional controlled clinical trials would contribute to a better understanding of the applications and advantages offered by CaHA.
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main purpose of this paper is to systematically review and summarize the efficacy of calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA) in terms of aesthetic effects, effects related to skin aging, and patient/researcher satisfaction in controlled clinical trials. Specifically, the research team evaluated the effects of CaHA injections in the facial area and the back of the hands by screening relevant controlled clinical trials. This included assessing the impact on the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), wrinkle reduction, increased skin thickness, and patient satisfaction. A total of 13 studies were included in the review, with 8 focusing on the facial area and 5 on the back of the hands. These studies generally showed that CaHA injections significantly improved aesthetic outcomes for the face and hands, with high patient satisfaction. The study also pointed out that although current evidence supports the role of CaHA injections in enhancing aesthetic outcomes for the face and hands, more controlled clinical trials are needed to further understand the advantages of CaHA application due to methodological limitations and heterogeneity among comparison groups.