Abstract:For a long time, the teaching mode of college English writing in China is relatively simple. That is to say, the teacher arranges class work, the students finish after class, and the teachers make collective explanations and evaluations, meaning the teaching methods are fixed. The content is empty and the students lack the abilities in English writing, which cannot guarantee its teaching effect. And students in the learning process have poor enthusiasm. As a result, they are difficult for some knowledge with difficult emotions. And improving their writing ability is not obvious. Thus, English listening, speaking, reading, writing and translation are weak. Students, in the process of completing their tasks, learn knowledge and improve their ability. 1. The content and application of the task-based pedagogy The task-based pedagogy is a brand-new teaching method, which focuses on the writing ability of students to carry out teaching [1]. With specific learning tasks as a carrier, students are guided to complete the task to master the knowledge and demonstrate the teaching effects through the task outcomes. Teachers in the classroom teaching activities will be designed to learn a series of tasks. Students in the process of completing the task of experience, practice, participation, exchange, natural language learn the second language [2]. In task-based teaching method, the main tasks of the task-oriented teaching method include five aspects: teaching goal, input of task contents, activities of using input materials, roles of teachers and students, learning environment, etc. The teaching goal is to guide students through the completion. A mission is needed to be closed in the real life of students. The use of input materials activities mainly refers to the use of language to learn and use activities. Teachers and students in the role of the teacher is the task of design organizers, monitors, mentors. And students are the task executor and activity participants. Learning environment mainly refers to the organization of classroom teaching and so on [3]. The application of task-based pedagogy in college English writing teaching should follow the following principles [4]: (1) Authenticity. That is to say, the materials involved in the design of tasks during the teaching activities should accord with the actual situation of the students. It is the scene of fulfilling the task. The specific activities and so on should come from life and create a good learning situation for the students. (2) Functional. The biggest problem in traditional English teaching in our country is that it divorced from the real context and weakened the communicative function of language. The task teaching method should follow the principle of function and it clarifies the relationship between language form and function. And it makes learners understand language in accomplishing the task. They enhance learners' understanding of the appropriateness of language. (3) Continuity. The main tasks are the teaching and logically maintain continuity. According to the established steps tasks and teaching content maintain coherence. And the procedures are to complete the task to help student better understand the language acquisition. (4) Operability. In order to avoid too many links, task design must take full account of its maneuverability and simplify the task process. The program is too complicated. It avoids entering the "task for the task of" errors. It not only focuses on the task of the form, but also it considers its effectiveness. The design of classroom tasks is to serve the teaching activities. (5) Fun. One of the biggest advantages of task-based teaching is to stimulate students’ interest in learning. It can enhance their learning initiative and guide students to acquire knowledge by completing tasks. Therefore, task design must follow the fun principle to stimulate students' enthusiasm for learning 2018 International Conference on Social Sciences, Education and Management (SOCSEM 2018) Copyright © (2018) Francis Academic Press, UK 661 and improve learning outcomes. 2. The specific application of the task-based teaching method According to the general procedure of task-based pedagogy, its application in college English writing teaching includes the following aspects [5-6]: 2.1 Pre-writing tasks The so-called pre-writing task is that teachers provide students with specific goals and significance of the task. The specific types include reading summary or feeling, bibliography, experience reports, case studies, comprehensive data, research trials, etc. All aspects of the task are stimulating student interest in writing and improving teaching effectiveness. Teachers can arrange the students to write "resume" writing tasks, personal resume. And student's life is directly related to the actual students to participate in writing tasks. They are also more positive in line with the task-based teaching method of authenticity, functionality, operability. They allow students to try writing "experiment report" to enrich the task content. The arrangement of the previous tasks should pay attention to changing the context and task content of the task so as to help the students in a rich language situation. In order to improve students' English writing skills, we should guide the students to stimulate their different background knowledge and language information in different language forms. After determining the task, the teacher can provide several essays for the students to analyze the key points and highlights of the writing together with the students so that they can better master the writing skills. 2.2 Medium-term writing tasks Mid-term tasks include all aspects of a student's writing process until completion of writing, in which students will write in English according to the teacher's pre-arranged writing task. The students can finish their tasks in the teacher's required time. During the medium-term writing stage, the teacher can distribute students to a number of small groups. Students can study and collaborate on writing contents, writing plans and collecting information. After the first draft of the paper is jointly identified in the group, the teacher writes English. The teacher should make clear the problems to be discussed by each group during the grouping. It includes the content of the writing, the purpose of the writing, the writing attitude to the task, the degree of understanding the content of the writing task, the degree of interest in the writing task, sub-task writing focus, writing task positioning readers and so on. Mutual discussion among the groups can help students to clarify the purpose of writing, exchange writing methods, writing opinions and so on. Upon completion of the group's task, each group nominated a representative to report the results in English and note the fluency and accuracy of the language being written. 2.3 Post-writing analysis After completing the writing task, the students enter into the later stage of analysis. Through the summary and analysis of the tasks, the students form a correct and objective cognition of this writing task. They discuss the problems, improve the problems and improve their English writing skills. After each group completes the group report, the teacher evaluates, analyzes and analyzes the work of each group. The content of the analysis can be the subject of the writing of the article, the argument of a certain viewpoint, the merit of encouraging the students, and the inadequacy pointed out. Pay attention to the writing evaluation of students cannot be too general. It is easy to dampen the enthusiasm of students. To take a variety of evaluation methods, including teacher reviews, student self-assessment, student assessment of each other, the student self-assessment can be summed up the experience of the task to complete. In comparison with this task with the previous task of different, their progress is objective. Student assessment of each other is to evaluate the work of other students and other students in the subtleties of the article and the existence of deficiencies. They put forward constructive comments and suggestions. Student assessment can improve students' ability to identify and modify their self so as to improve students' awareness of

Comparing composing processes in writing-only and reading-to-write test tasks

Application Analysis of Task - Based Teaching in College English Writing Teaching

“I should summarize this whole paragraph”: Shared processes of reading and writing in iterative integrated assessment tasks

Assessing Integrated Writing Tasks for Academic Purposes: Promises and Perils

Toward a Transparent Construct of Reading-to-Write Tasks: The Interface Between Discourse Features and Proficiency

Exploring the relationship of organization and connection with scores in integrated writing assessment

Processes Involved in Chinese and English Writing: A Study of Chinese University Students

The Influence of EFL Proficiency on Written Products in Independent and Integrated Writing Tasks

Examining Performance on an Integrated Writing Task from a Canadian English Language Proficiency Test

Strategic processing of source text in reading-into-writing tasks: A comparison between summary and argumentative tasks

Investigating the interactions between L2 writing processes and products under different task planning time conditions

Exploring and modeling the reading-writing connection in EFL integrated writing

What accounts for integrated reading-to-write task scores?

The Interplay of Task Characteristics, Linguistic Complexity, and Language Proficiency in High‐Stakes English as a Foreign Language Writing

Preparing for the Speaking Tasks of the TOEFL iBT® Test: An Investigation of the Journeys of Chinese Test Takers

Using multiple texts in an integrated writing assessment: Source text use as a predictor of score

Topic Effects On Writing Performance: What Do Students And Their Writings Tell Us?

Towards more valid scoring criteria for integrated reading-writing and listening-writing summary tasks

The role of reading strategies in integrated L2 writing tasks

Establishing Comparability Across Writing Tasks With Picture Prompts of Three Alternate Tests

Holistic and Analytic Assessments of the TOEFL iBT® Integrated Writing Task