Bromocriptine Mesylate Attenuates Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Phase 2a, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Research in Japanese Patients

Eiichiro Nagata,Mieko Ogino,Kounosuke Iwamoto,Yasuhisa Kitagawa,Yasuo Iwasaki,Fumihito Yoshii,Joh-E Ikeda,ALS Consortium Investigators,Shigeharu Takagi,Shunya Takizawa,Tomohide Ohnuki,Yasunosuke Iwamoto,Wako Takahashi,Yuko Ohnuki,Kyuichiro Onoue,Ichiro Kanazawa,Shigeki Kuzuhara,Yasuo Itoyama,Hajime Sobue
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149509
IF: 3.7
2016-02-24
PLoS ONE
Abstract:Objective: Bromocriptine mesylate (BRC), a dopamine D2 receptor agonist has been shown to confer neuroprotection, sustained motor function and slowed disease progression in mouse models of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) Here we report a first in human trial in ALS. Design: A multicenter, Riluzole add-on, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled 102-week extension BRC clinical trial. Methods: The trial was conducted between January 2009 and March 2012 on 36 Japanese ALS patients. A 12-week treatment with Riluzole observational period was followed by combined treatment (Riluzole + BRC; n = 29 or Riluzole + placebo; n = 7). The dosing commenced at 1.25 mg/day increasing in steps at two weeks intervals to a maximum of 15 mg/day. The efficacy of BRC was evaluated by comparing BRC and placebo groups upon completion of stepwise dosing at 14 weeks 2 points (1st endpoint) and upon completion or discontinuation of the study (2nd endpoint) of the dosing. Results: Statistics analyses revealed a marginal BRC treatment efficacy with P≦20%to placebo by 1st and 2nd endpoint analysis. In the 1st endpoint analysis, BRC group was significantly effective on the scores of ALSAQ40-communicaton (P = 1.2%), eating and drinking (P = 2.2%), ALSFRS-R total (P = 17.6%), grip strength (P = 19.8%) compared to the placebo group. In the 2nd endpoint analysis, differences between the scores of Limb Norris Scale (P = 18.3%), ALSAQ40-communication (P = 11.9%), eating and drinking (P = 13.6%), and neck forward-bent test (P = 15.4%) of BRC group were detected between the two groups. There was no significant difference between the treatment groups for adverse events or serious drug reactions incidence. Conclusions: BRC sustains motoneuronal function at least in part through BRC treatment. Further analysis involving a Phase 2b or 3 clinical trial is required but BRC currently shows promise for ALS treatment. Trial registration: UMIN Clinical Trials UMIN000008527.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?